British Drug Smuggler’s Death Sentence, Netizen Reactions

akmalil-shaikh

Recently, a British drug smuggler’s death sentence was upheld by the Supreme People’s Court in China. News on Xinhuanet.com:

Death penalty on British drug dealer in line with Chinese law: spokesman

BEIJING, Oct. 13 (Xinhua) — Chinese court’s sentence of death penalty on a British drug trafficker is in line with Chinese laws, said a spokesman for China’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs on Tuesday.

Akmal Shaikh, 53, male, was sentenced to death in the first instance trial by the Intermediate People’s Court of Urumqi Municipality in northwest China’s Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region on Oct. 29, 2008, said Ma Zhaoxu, spokesman for the Ministry of Foreign Affairs at a regular news briefing.

The case is currently being reviewed by China’s Supreme People’s Court, Ma said.

“All the procedures have been in line with relevant Chinese laws. During the trial, The accused and the counsel had freely exercised their rights of defense, and translation service had been provided to the accused. His legal rights had been fully guaranteed,” he said.

According to Ma, the British embassy in China and a British organization had proposed to organize mental disease examinations on Akmal Shaikh, while offering no evidence that he may be suffering from mental disease.

The accused had said that he and his family members had no history of mental diseases, Ma said.

The case is under examination, he said.

So what do Chinese people think of the sentence online? A survey from Huanqiu.com shows that among the netizens who took the survey:

  • 98.8% (3528 votes) support the Supreme People’s Court’s sentence;
  • 96.7% (3737 votes) think the British media is interfering in China’s internal affairs.

In another survey that asks “What do you think of British media’s report on this incident”:

  • 53.9% (1924 votes) think these reports show Britain still has an outdated colonial mindset;
  • 30.1% (1074 votes) think the British media is using “human rights” as an excuse;
  • 16.0% (569 votes) think they are sensationalizing this incident with malicious intentions.

English coverage can be found on Google News.

Following are some translated Chinese comments from various source:

From Huanqiu.com:

Of course I support. No matter if he’s Chinese or a foreigner, on Chinese land, he should obey Chinese laws.

Mercy to drug smugglers is a crime against the people.

People’s rights are based on the fact that everyone should be equal in front of laws. If we released this British criminal, what should we do to Chinese drug dealers? Should we abandon the death penalty? These scrum [drug dealers] would even risk their lives to smuggle drugs. If there’s no death penalty, what will they be afraid of?

So if Hitler had “delusional psychosis and bipolar disorder”, why do British people dig him from his grave every year [sarcasm]? That’s so “lack of human rights”.

The Chinese government should not pay much attention to British pressure. Drug smugglers deserve death penalty.

PRC government is not the same government in Qing Dynasty. We have judicial supremacy.

British dude, do you know? In ancient China the law is much more cruel. If you cheat in an exam, you die.

From Netease.com:

From Chengdu, Sichuan:

Britain should thank us for saving them from yet another drug dealer.

From Guangzhou, Guangdong:

The one who has “delusional psychosis and bipolar disorder” is the British media.

From Nanjing, Jiangsu:

International drug smugglers come commit crimes against the Chinese people. One comes, we kill one. Two come, we shoot a pair. Bullets for these scum are plenty. I support the Supreme People’s Court’s sentence. He should pay a price for violating Chinese laws.

From Changsha:

What he’s sentenced with is not the death sentence but loneliness.

From Qinzhou:

Akmal must die. We are collecting signatures to support his death penalty.

From Macfans.com.cn:

Ghmily from Guangzhou:

Wow! Four kilograms! And he put 4k heroin in his hand band just like that and tried to enter China? Is that too ignorant/arrogant?

Bfee:

I’m fed up with those people who use “mental disorder” as an excuse [to evade punishment from laws]. If you are mentally sick you don’t have to pay a price for your crime? Everyone on the planet has some level of “disorder” in mind so we are all free from responsibilities …

Spirit of Six Strings:

[He] should be executed in public. “Pong” and China’s drug smuggling will drop by 30% immediately. Or we inject all 4kg heroin into his vein at once. If he can still survive then we let him go.

Jambillking:

4 kg! He deserves several deaths. [Smuggling 50 gram heroin is the threshold for a death penalty in China.]

Share This Article

216 Comments

  • Some HTML can be used to format your comment.
  • Add a picture to your comments with Gravatar.
  • Our Comment Policy.
  1. People kill people and go to jail without a death sentence and drug shouldn’t command such sentence and if he was gonna be given a death sentence,it would be better to arrest the buyers too and fuck them all up after all the buyers are mostly chinese.

    Most Chinese men don’t like white boys coz they always lose their women to them so that’s why you suckers are yelling kill him and not coz the chinese law states that.This is just some personal individual selfish rage in exhibition here.

    Now to you fucking drug dealers,quit fucking around and that includes you fucking drug takers too!

    • what are you talking about,your day dreams???we have a kg heroin smuggler here,can you just leave sex alone for a while? omg,how can I disscus legal matter with people like you…

  2. You can forget what ever the Chinese say they are all programed by the communist party from birth. Their media is run by the communist party. There is no truthfull media there as well as their surveys are fixed to go with the party line. And they never get the real truth about any story. Chinese goverment has zero crediblity around the world. Remember Tianamin square.

    • I lived in NZ for almost 10 years,and look back to tianamen square,I ‘m sure that the goverment was right..If you can’t understand China interest ,then stop guessing,you indian madcow worship loser..

  3. Initially I would like to be clear that I in no way agree with or support the death penalty.

    However I do support a nations right to the sovereignty of it’s legal system. at the time of sentencing China had no clear definitions in either psychiatry or law for issues such as guardianship, compulsory treatment, and competency.(1). Therefore the mental competncy argument has no weight and the death penalty is legal in this case regardless.

    While appeals of a humanitarian nature maybe made to the Chinese government, nobody has the right to judge their verdict.

    1.Park L, Xiao ZP, Worth J, Park JM. Mental health care in China: recent changes and future challenges. Harvard Health Policy Rev 2005; 6: 36-45.

    Taken from Comparing models of mental health service systems between Australia and China: implications for the future development of Chinese mental health service
    (2008)

  4. Speaking as a Brit – are we short on drug smugglers/dealers? NO so go ahead and excecute him PLEASE!!!! I dont give a shit if hes bipolar or whatever he knew what he was getting into and everyone is well aware NOT to carry other peoples things through an airport. I just wish we had the death penalty here in the UK so we could empty some of our prisons and get some more scum off the streets!!!

  5. Wow. Love to see a hot debate here.

    A couple thoughts here and also to clear some of the misconceptions too.

    1. “Human Right”
    This is term that I have seen often globally misrepresented. A. WHO defined the term of “Human Right” ;B. Under WHAT social belief? C. WHICH part of WHOSE right is more important?

    These questions are very important when the term is cited or introduced to anywhere. Taken China for example.

    A. The term a lot people now are using is not created by Chinese nor any Chinese has been involved in the process. So, do not expect they will agree nor

    B. To say they are savages because ignorance of others’ culture does not equal to one’s superior being but a only blindly boost of self-esteem.

    C. I am afraid to say in China, individual’s “Human Right” even of it’s life is defiantly not the most priority nor it is counted anywhere close to the front. It is explicitly expressed in all document and education materials in China that the “Right of the Collective” is the most important and any threats are to be eliminated and other Rights must be compromised. In this case, the integrity of the Chinese Law and being able to ENFORCE the law above one individual life by not setting a precedent under foreign political influence. Also, for the logic of capital punishment on drug trafficking is because the collective right of not being abused by any drug related activities is far more important than a single life. Killing a thousand innocents in order not to miss one guilty is something that has been developed from the last 5000 years in China. So deal with it.

    Your “Human Right” is not the same thing of what the Chinese version.

    2. “Due Process”
    One problem the media has been criticizing is the due process of the trial that the court didn’t give a chance for the defendant to review and prove his bipolar disorder. If anyone work in the legal system would know due process is part of the game not the whole. Tens or maybe hundreds of motions in a trial in order to get a better position under the name of “Due Process”. For so many reports about the case, most of them are opinionated not facts or case detail related. This makes me wonder during the process, how much technical play the defense counsel has really played right. Why no plead bargaining has been discussed from the beginning? Why the defense position has changed several times. Why no one talked about whether there was something strategically wrong the defense tactic? Did diplomatic involvement and media help the case or ruin it? You want to play the game? You better play it right. Personally speaking, I think the defense side had made a lot of mistakes from the beginning till the end. Death probation plead should be first thing the defense team go after not anything else. Because, in criminal trials in China presumption of guilty is still the main stream principle not presumption of innocence. And forget about the UDHR or any other “International Declarations”, they are not Chinese law and can not be cited in court. PLAY WITH THE RULE!!!

    3. “Poor Legal System” “Retaliation to the accusation Climate Change Summit” “Lack of Human Right”

    One sentence for all media, governments and activist groups. Bigotry DO NOT WORK on Chinese. That’s why Shaikh got a over 98% of approval to death penalty from an online survey in China. All involvement from media and government only triggered a national urge to the capital penalty within the country. Do it smart next time. Chinese do not like foreign media. Trust me, Chinese think foreign media bull shit too much. This is not because they are “brain washed”, it is because they see things in a much different way. The guy could had been excused from death, if you guys hadn’t made it such a huge deal.

    4. “Guilty? Not guilty?”
    The defense side had been fighting for Shaikh’s innocent since the beginning. All the motions, tactics, and story telling are so familiar as it is no different to a regular criminal charge in anywhere else in the world. Judges, professionals and even regular people are tired of these “excuses”. Without further evidence, it is nearly impossible to save Shaikh from being caught red-handed.

    Any way this is has come to the end. The guy was “convicted” and he is a dead meat. For people still believe he’s innocent. Hope you learn something from this case and know how to deal with such situation next time.

  6. NEWS UPDATE – He’s dead
    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/8433285.stm

    Good! THE GUY WAS A DRUG DEALER FOR CHRIST’S SAKE. Got evidence he was mentally ill? Then where was it shown on the news? and if you had the evidence, why wasn’t it shown? Your evidence would have helped convince many skeptics and yet it was all words words words and nothing more. If you really wanted to save the guy then you should have shown the certificates or evidence on the news BEFORE he was executed. So where was it? Where was the hardcore evidence that he was soooooooo mentally ill that it could have saved his life?

    I can’t believe people who supported this man actually chowed down and digested this crap. One lesser evil the world I say. Good work China! Excellent! No mercy on drug dealers. I hope they all die. I really do! They start drug wars, created drug junkies, start crime. The execution itself has prevented a butterfly effect they would have caused a huge hazard to the world we live in. How do I know? You know any drug dealers that has created paradise through their disgusting and illegal industry? No.

  7. I find it sad that anyone can take any form of gratification from the death of a human being. He was a drug dealer, but to even argue that he deserved to die, suggests that giving control over life and death to another human being is right. Using the death penalty to eradicate imperfections in any society will leave you only with a world full of perfect monsters.

  8. 200 years ago they drugged us, looted us, and when we tried to stop the drugs, they fought us
    now with a million-men army, 3rd largest GDP, and a huge foreign reserve, they aint no pushing us no more

  9. http://news.xinhuanet.com/video/2009-12/30/content_12727541.htm
    Correct me if I’m wrong, but this dickhead Ye Hai Lin is saying that a country’s laws should be respected, then complaining when Gordon Brown exercises his right to freedom of speech in expressing ‘disappointment’ etc.

    What is it with the chip on these people’s shoulders?

    • He is not disappointed at Gordon Brown exercising his freedom of speech, rather the disappointment is over the content of the Brown’s speech. Put it another way, while I can respect it is your right to confuse and equivocate the two concepts I am not obligated to concur with your nonsense. Does that clear things up for you?

      • I think I’m clear – someone is allowed to have an opinion, as long as it is not critical and might hurt people’s feelings, is that right?

        • You are free to have an opinion, whatever they may be, doesn’t mean I have to agree or like it though.

          Gordan Brown may feel angered, appalled and disappointed all he wants, and China executed a drug dealer as per laws of the land, and considers Brown’s comments intrusive and frankly, inappropriate. If he has a problem with Chinese law – apparently only when they are applied to British citizens – he should stop British citizens from traveling to China, and/or work out a system where he consults the Chinese government every time the British justice system sentences a Chinese national. Maybe then the Chinese government will offer quid pro quo considerations.

          • Yes because everyone is so often looking for that oh so hard to find justice in the UK. Especially people of other nations. When they visit that country their friends are always telling them to be careful because the Queen is the sole authority and can have you thrown in prison no matter what the laws say. They tell you all these stories about people being executed within 60 days of the crime or less, of sleeping judges, of confessions given by torture, etc. They’ll tell you about how jew’s in that country so often beat up on germans for their part in WW2 and about how when a german comes up for a speeding ticket the judge will of course mention the first world war as a reason for his sentence being so severe. If one see’s murder one does not simply call it murder with Chinese characteristics and go about their day. If it’s done to his citizen then he cannot simply stand by if he wants to keep his job as a leader of the free world.

  10. I think the Chinese government where right in executing this man. The “mental-illness” excuse was a poor attempt to disguse his crime…he was clearly in search of a “quick-buck”…not a career as a pop-star as some of the press would have people believe.

    If you visit another country you have to respect their laws and customs…if you break those laws and customs you have to expect to be treated accordingly..China executes drug smugglers..hence he was executed.

    The U.K. government should have shown some courage and stood behind the Chinese government who were right in their actions.

    Ben (a U.K. tourist currently in China)

    • Dear Tourist, please keep your ignorance to yourself!Shaikh was my neighbour in London and you obviously have no knowledge of him or the overwhelming evidence that he was insane and delusional, provided by people who knew him well. He was not given a fair trial and now it is too late; the strongest argument against the death penalty is ireversible injustices such as this one. You also have no knowledge of the Chinese legal system. I hope you get a taste of Chinese justice one day, I hope they throw you in a gaol without a fair trial or an interpreter, deny you a lawyer, ignore all the evidence and use you to say “Fuck Off” to Britain. And throw away the key. I will be saying serves him right, he should respect the customs and laws of China!

      • @Simon Brown
        Again where is the evidence. You “claim” you are his next door neighbor and you “claim” he was delusional.

        Even if you really are his neighbor and you truly think everything this drug dealer said was true about his retardation, let me ask you this. How on earth did a delusional man manage to get his ass into China and also have 4kg of heroin on him? If the parents are making such a big case out of this on the news, how on earth did they let this mentally unstable man leave their “watchful” eyes if he really was getting really unstable just before he was taken in?

        Also, answer this for me. The guy had so much heroin on him it could have bought him a fucking mansion and more. Why on earth would drug dealers or people who supposedly “framed” him would be dumb enough to throw away that amount of drug street value just to lock a supposedly retarded man away.

        This isn’t about how he should have been treated. It was the story bought forward to the Chinese court. And the Chinese court smelled bullshit coming from every crevice of his body. So China should give special treatment to liars now?

    • i think they did right by doing it!!! if we had that here we would not have half the problems with drugs that we have i would have killed him by making him eat it every last gram!! 4 kilo ha!!! think of your own children if they got on this shit!!! make him eat the shit in public that would have been a warning to any pratt that wants to do this, WELL DONE CHINA!!! IM ENGLISH AND I AGREE WITH WHAT YOU HAVE DONE FUCK BROWN HE IS ANOTHER PRATT!! WELL DONE WELL DONE WELL DONE!!!!

  11. I find this blog article is rather eloquent in defending China’s stance on Akmal incident so I translated it.If you can read Chinese, here is the source: http://blog.ifeng.com/article/3890130.html
    And if there is any grammar mistake, pls pardon my lack of proficiency…

    WHO KILLED AKMAL?

    The first decade of the 21st century is passing into history, in which a sudden conflict broke out between Chinese and British government, which haven’t quarreled for a long time. Because of the large-scale intervention from the British Premier Gordon Brown, the British administration of Diplomacy and international media, this conflict is escalating to a national level. In six month, the British government negotiated with China for 10 times, and Brown per se even pleaded to China regardless his dignity as a premier. To everyone’s surprise, the target of a permanent member in UN Council’s fanfare is a drug dealer: Akmal.

    In the morning on September 12th, 2009, the British citizen Akmal Shaikh arrived at Urumuqi International Airport from Dushanbe, Tajikstan with 4 kilograms of heroin, and was caught on site by Chinese custom security. As every one knows, drug-dealing is perceived as a severe crime which causes serious social harm and gets heavily punished all over the world, including Britain. 4 kilograms of heroin is enough to kill 26.8 thousand people! Facing an explicit crime like this, nothing is unsual when China sentenced Akmal to death according to its own law. On a high moral level, China is ridding the world and Britain of harm; on a low one, China is protecting its own people from being harmed by drugs.

    However, such a legally and ethically rightful act, a pure crime case, incited a storm in Britain. At first, the Britain embassy in China requested for a psycho-evaluation. According to China’s laws, the materials brought up by Britain is inadquate to prove that Akmal is mentally disturbed, nor any of Akmal’s relatives had a history of mental disease, and the request was naturally turned down .

    Then the “desprate” Britains started to use the raicial tactic, emphasising on purpose that Akmal is the first European excuted by China in 50 years. Akmal’s family instead used sympathy tactic: his brother wrote a letter to Fu Ying, the Chinese embassador to Britain, which pleaded that China should show mercy because Akmal’s children will be sad if their father was excuted, he himself sad for losing his sibling, his mother sad and probably get a heart attack. The Britain premier then used his humanitarian tactic to wage one and another soft yet hardened offense. However, China stood its ground and executed the death penalty lawfully, which not only defended its own judicial soverenity but also showed its commitment to prevent Chinese citizens from being harmed by drugs.

    Despite that Akmal was executed, a lot of questions still hang aroung in my mind. Why would Britain theater such an all-out rescue for a drug dealer disregarding its dignity and the suspicion of intervening Chinese judiciary soverenity? Why would a mighty permanent member of the UN Council loses face to the world on such a trival incident? Who killed Akmal?

    The fact is, if you understand westerners, you would know that Britain government doesn’t want to rescue Akmal at all, and everything is just a show. Poor Akmal is just a sacrifice to the need of political interests. In fact, if Britain government really wants to rescue Akmal, it will be very simple. First, you exchange with your national interest; second, you have to do it behind the stage, not a public fanfare like this.

    You want your criminal citizen back but has nothing to exchange? Britain, a country skilled in diplomacy couldn’t be so naive on this point. In 1980s, two French secret agents sinked “Rainbow Warrior”, the flagship of Green Peace organization, then got caught and was sentenced to prison by New Zealand government. To rescue them, France ingloriously used various diplomatic resources even trade measures. If Britains forgets history, think about Lai Changxing, the Chinese criminal hiding in Canada, the ex UK colony.

    Second, as a major country skilled in diplomacy, Britain certainly knows about every country has its own different conditions and how to deal with them in different ways. Dealing with a country like China, which puts so much emphasis on “face”, theatring a public fanfare just equals pushing Akmal to the guillotine. Even if China wants to spare him against its own laws, when it gets public, China has no other choice but execution. What’s more, Britain knows well about the history between the two countries. The first war between these two countries were caused by Britain dumping opium to China, after which westerners established extraterritoriality, and China lost its judiciary soverenity. Britain making trouble again over a drug-dealer is definitely an aggressive move to the whole Chinese nation. When this case got public, 99% Chinese netizens supports death penalty. Which government dare to make a concession to foreign countries against such an internal public pressure?

    At last, if Britain really doesn’t understand this, it has other rounded ways to Akmal’s rescue. For example, it can declare Akmal’s status as an Britain special agent, and the heroin he carried with is for the need of cracking down drug-trafficking. There are precedent examples of Britain’s “pragmatic diplomacy”. When the corruption scandal erupted in Saudi and Britain arm-sale, the Britain government closed the case in the name of national interest because the scandal was related to Saudi royalties. If Britain still fails to comprehend, look at France. The French Defense Department once refused to publicize its documents in the name of national security, and acquitted all related suspects. Both Britains and French lacks no wisdom in these cases.

    Obviously, what the Britain government trully intended was to utilize Akmal’s death rather than rescue him. Gordon the premier could present his people-first image by making China a brutal and ruthless country to rescue his poor poll-survey statistics. What’s more, the racial propaganda by western media could again get China demonized and obstruct it from rising for a while. Akmal, a drug-dealer’s death could bring so much political gain, why not to kill him?

    It’s just that our poor Akmal even doesn’t know how he was pushed to the gallows. He even thanked his democratic, humanitarian government and his benevolent premier Gorden Brown before his death.

    Of course, somebody worried that executing Akmal will make an impact on Sino-Britain relationship because Britain is rather “angry” and “condemned China in strongest terms”. This anger is real, yet it’s still a show. We could make it clear that, the Sino-Britain relationship won’t be affected at all–why would Britain cut its relationship with China over a drug-dealer it doesn’t give a damn? Judging by Britain’s wisdom and national power, in two year’s time, it could rescue Akmal for ten times. I’m even suspecting that, when China waited for two years to execute Akmal, it was indeed waiting for Brtain’s bargain.

    • I can’t be bothered to read the rest as it’s probably the same histrionic claptrap that I have had to put up with for too long. But:
      1. 2009? So was it two months or two years?
      2. The last sentence. You mean your country was using someone’s life to bargain for a better deal on the import of MP3 players or what?

    • Sorry I did actually start reading it because I have nothing better to do and I came across the following enjoyable gambits:
      3. Don’t kid yourself, Canada is its own place. We don’t want anything to do with those blackguards. (PS. How did Lai Changxing become such an enemy of the state, if it wasn’t building up a great sub-economy through his ‘relationships’ with officials and falling foul of them when he didn’t slip them enough under the table)
      4. You use this diatribe as a comeback. How long will it take you to realise that inward-looking, opionated pieces do not do any favours for your cause?
      5. This ‘enough to kill 26.8 thousand people’ claptrap. This is based on what exactly? Did you mean ‘supply’ or kill? If it’s the latter, what size of person and what level of addiction would achieve this?

  12. One moron died BIG DEAL!!!

    Brit f**k heads LEARN from this
    1. Keep your lunatic neighbor, father, relative, friend AT YOUR WATCH!!!! or they will go chase their wild dream of becoming a POP STAR while he is a popping 53!!!! fucking old dude

    2.Check the case someone gave you. Even if you are an idiot. Now you know that you are if you haven’t thought about it.

    3. Get yourself a better excuse next time. Chinese do NOT give a shit to lunatics. One less moron or drug dealer on earth is better for the human race.

    4. It is the Ching’s FREEDOM OF FUCKING SPEECH to fuck Gordon Brown and you!! at the international broadcast and to ask you to shut the fuck up. Don’t understand this? TAKE A LOGIC CLASS!!!!

  13. If the guy had actually been mentally ill and had been completely unaware of what he was doing. Would you still think that the guy should be executed?

  14. Why exactly should “human rights” apply to Pakis? If they’re not blowing up British buses and girls schools, they’re smuggling smack and fucking their cousins.

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/programmes/newsnight/4442010.stm

    “It is estimated that at least 55% of British Pakistanis are married to first cousins”

    “British Pakistanis are 13 times more likely to have children with genetic disorders than the general population – they account for just over 3% of all births but have just under a third of all British children with such illnesses. “

  15. You stole the words right from my mouth. Why the hell should we care that some would be terrorist is going to be killed. Americans are more concerned about alley cats, for crying out loud.

  16. People try to save drug dealer? Have they eat wrong medicine? They do know drug dealer is bad guy?

    • This is both amusing and sad. I haven’t been back for a while but I have a few points:

      1. Chinese ‘tourists’ who have happened to wander upon this place and want to make a point. Your failure to grasp basic grammar gives you right away (despite your protestations). Yes I know you’ve been programmed, but you have to understand, if we’re here, we LIKE China, we RESPECT China. It’s you guys who have a chip on your shoulder (or a chipolata in your..) that bring it down
      2. There are people like the fella above who have clearly gone native and are bringing their Texan law into an argument where it is not relevant
      3. I actually think the ‘retardation’ (as you so eloquently put it) angle was a load of codswallop and the last refuge of a damned man (although I also believe that needs must)
      4. When you go to a country you must respect the laws of that place. Also, live by the sword, die by the sword.
      5. My issue is not with the death sentence (although this is intrinsically flawed and a true indicator of a not fully developed country)
      6. The reason I was so riled was because you puppets got so riled by our leader actually expressing an opinion for one of our ‘citizens’ (even though I am of the opinion that he wasn’t really). I would equally respect the opinions of your ‘Who’ and ‘When’ if one of your ‘citizens’ had been so barbarically treated in a foreign country

  17. Learn to forgive and forget..
    though it’s not easy to be a Christian
    in such a scary world where not only goverments
    can’t forgive but ordinary people too!
    sad..pray always!
    hammar

  18. then if this is the case . all chinese drug smugglers should also die! a lot of chinese drug lords in the Philippines only get 10 years for selling coc for more than 10 years in their lives they should execute all chinese people in other countries who sold drugs and smuggled coc or marijuana all chinese mother smugglers these mother fukkers gotta die too!!! i mean.. the government doesnt have the right to kill someone or take a life only god has! god is not the government ,. REMEMBER THIS!!! THE GOVERNMENT IS NOT GOD!!! fukk all governments giving death sentences to drug smugglers!!! fukk em!

  19. and 1 more thing this british person probably has a kid waiting for him to come back home.. or maybe a wife or his family!! fukk the chinese government! who the fukk gave them the right to kill a smuggler fukk em! i hope who ever jury or judge decides to execute a smuggler that their families suffer and they all die just like this british person only trying to make money for his family!!!!!

    • he know what would happen when he get caught, but he still choose to do it. he choose money over his family. he choose to make thousands of peoples addicted to drugs (which destroys their lifes) for money. and have you ever thought about the families that he destroys while selling his drugs? he ALONE destroys thousands of families. he did what he want to do and now he get the consenquences.

  20. Gosh you people are cruel swines. what wrong with you it ‘s just drug ??
    There no drug in china, i think you need more, maybe something like lsd, or mescaline …i know this poor bastard was just bringing heroin, this drug is not that good, but hey i can be fun too..you swines need to change your dangerous atavistic mentality;;i am pretty sure drug could help !

  21. People committing a crime on Chinese land, should be punished by Chinese law.

  22. 53.9 + 30.1 + 16.0 = 100%

  23. no, only dalai lama, the criminal and his group of killers

  24. According to a source cited on wikipedia (eh~) the Chinese commissioner wanted the merchants to sign a waiver that forbade them from trafficking opium, or face the penalty, which the merchants refused to sign. Instead they accused Lin of destroying their property – Opium, illegal drug in China then as now, but at the time legal in Britain – the British sent troops to protect their drugs and drug dealers.

    Two centuries later, look how far we have come, the British are angry over their executed citizen but did not ask for a reimbursement on their heroin.

  25. England doesn’t have a foreign policy, just so you know.

  26. oh hmm haha reading back it’s actually pretty clear what you meant, oops.

  27. Sorry Jones. I hold my hands up that I was using Chinese-style pistrionic misunderstanding to further my point. I have nothing against Texas and I misused an example there. It was directed to a guy above (that I can’t find now) who seemed very gung-ho towards the death penalty and easier due to the fact that the guy had brown skin.
    Apology offered..

Personals @ chinaSMACK - Meet people, make friends, find lovers? Don't be so serious!»