﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Copenhagen Climate Conference Failure, Chinese Reaction</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chinasmack.com/2009/stories/copenhagen-climate-change-conference-failure-chinese-reactions.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chinasmack.com/2009/stories/copenhagen-climate-change-conference-failure-chinese-reactions.html</link>
	<description>Hot internet stories, pictures, &#38; videos in China</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 22:33:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Somethin Somethin</title>
		<link>http://www.chinasmack.com/2009/stories/copenhagen-climate-change-conference-failure-chinese-reactions.html/comment-page-1#comment-49635</link>
		<dc:creator>Somethin Somethin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 08:59:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chinasmack.com/?p=12951#comment-49635</guid>
		<description>Shanghainese girls and their 20-80 year old sugar daddies?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shanghainese girls and their 20-80 year old sugar daddies?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Somethin Somethin</title>
		<link>http://www.chinasmack.com/2009/stories/copenhagen-climate-change-conference-failure-chinese-reactions.html/comment-page-#comment-49632</link>
		<dc:creator>Somethin Somethin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 08:52:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chinasmack.com/?p=12951#comment-49632</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d love to see a thread about the shoddy, halfass, pretty for 15 minutes, ugly, rusted and crumbling for 15 years building techniques in the major cities of China. In terms of safety its hardly as bad as the fact that you&#039;re freezing your ass off, running your quota on the meters keeping every appliance that keeps you warm or cool(winter/summer)running. As for the 22 tons of coal reference. Walk by a Chinese office building in summer. Both doors wide open and you can feel the cool hair hit you at 30 meters or more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d love to see a thread about the shoddy, halfass, pretty for 15 minutes, ugly, rusted and crumbling for 15 years building techniques in the major cities of China. In terms of safety its hardly as bad as the fact that you&#8217;re freezing your ass off, running your quota on the meters keeping every appliance that keeps you warm or cool(winter/summer)running. As for the 22 tons of coal reference. Walk by a Chinese office building in summer. Both doors wide open and you can feel the cool hair hit you at 30 meters or more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Somethin Somethin</title>
		<link>http://www.chinasmack.com/2009/stories/copenhagen-climate-change-conference-failure-chinese-reactions.html/comment-page-1#comment-49610</link>
		<dc:creator>Somethin Somethin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 06:29:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chinasmack.com/?p=12951#comment-49610</guid>
		<description>The Chinese should just sit content that the US sits atop its pile of Indian skulls and dead Phillipino&#039;s  with a somewhat more humanistic approach of cooperation. Realpolitik is a wonderful thing if you&#039;re the only one at the table playing. If the US decided EVERYTHING based on the realist&#039;s ideals then China&#039;s tears would flood the Yangze and the world and China would be a poorer place for it. If this is your ideal my friend then I simply feel sorry for you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Chinese should just sit content that the US sits atop its pile of Indian skulls and dead Phillipino&#8217;s  with a somewhat more humanistic approach of cooperation. Realpolitik is a wonderful thing if you&#8217;re the only one at the table playing. If the US decided EVERYTHING based on the realist&#8217;s ideals then China&#8217;s tears would flood the Yangze and the world and China would be a poorer place for it. If this is your ideal my friend then I simply feel sorry for you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Somethin Somethin</title>
		<link>http://www.chinasmack.com/2009/stories/copenhagen-climate-change-conference-failure-chinese-reactions.html/comment-page-1#comment-48374</link>
		<dc:creator>Somethin Somethin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 10:25:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chinasmack.com/?p=12951#comment-48374</guid>
		<description>CO2 is what we breathe out my dear friend. And any chemical in excess is generally considered negative. I love water as much as anyone but I can&#039;t breathe the shit or live on it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CO2 is what we breathe out my dear friend. And any chemical in excess is generally considered negative. I love water as much as anyone but I can&#8217;t breathe the shit or live on it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: apensi</title>
		<link>http://www.chinasmack.com/2009/stories/copenhagen-climate-change-conference-failure-chinese-reactions.html/comment-page-1#comment-48075</link>
		<dc:creator>apensi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 01:06:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chinasmack.com/?p=12951#comment-48075</guid>
		<description>More than a year ago, Mr. Obama said of climate change: “Delay is no longer an option. Denial is no longer an acceptable response.”

But when Mr. Obama and other world leaders met last month, they were forced to abandon the goal of reaching a binding accord at Copenhagen because the American political system is not ready to agree to a treaty that would force the United States, over time, to accept profound changes in its energy, transport and manufacturing sectors.

So the leaders said they planned to leave Copenhagen with an interim political deal and work toward a binding treaty next year.

Delay, it turns out, was the only option.

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/12/13/weekinreview/13broder.html?_r=1&amp;ref=global-home</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More than a year ago, Mr. Obama said of climate change: “Delay is no longer an option. Denial is no longer an acceptable response.”</p>
<p>But when Mr. Obama and other world leaders met last month, they were forced to abandon the goal of reaching a binding accord at Copenhagen because the American political system is not ready to agree to a treaty that would force the United States, over time, to accept profound changes in its energy, transport and manufacturing sectors.</p>
<p>So the leaders said they planned to leave Copenhagen with an interim political deal and work toward a binding treaty next year.</p>
<p>Delay, it turns out, was the only option.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/12/13/weekinreview/13broder.html?_r=1&#038;ref=global-home" rel="nofollow">http://www.nytimes.com/2009/12/13/weekinreview/13broder.html?_r=1&#038;ref=global-home</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

