AIDS Is A Mass Murderer Ads, Some Chinese Netizen Reactions

German advertising campaign: AIDS is a mass murderer.

From Tiexue:

Scary advertisement where AIDS is like a tyrant/despot (appropriately speechless, this is Western logic)

AIDS is a mass murderer: Adolf Hitler

AIDS is a mass murderer: Saddam Hussein

AIDS is a mass murderer: Joseph Stalin

Comments from Tiexue:

woqdmz04052:

Actually, Western countries should take a photograph of American soldiers raping Iraqi women to promote AIDS prevention.

hylkp018:

AIDS is a mass murderer Photoshop: Barack Obama

This is even more in line with current trends.

aa498102179:

When I saw this, I was actually really afraid of scrolling down to see Old Mao~~~~

lizo1:

The last one is still closer to reality.

shioroamada:

Linking the virus with politics; comparing death in biological evolution with ideological slaughter…
I think this advertisement is too much wishful thinking.
And what more, it will be opposed by Russians, and doesn’t help the promotion of fighting AIDS.

半条毛毛虫:

The head should be changed to Sister Feng.

qxwcnm:

Laowai advertisements are always creative.

txw0:

I believe this disease was invented/created by Americans.

飘飘游侠儿:

Stalin is promoted in the West as a tyrant/despot, in China a father figure.

lionzhan:

AIDS is a mass murderer Photoshop: Barack Obama with Sister Feng

This one must be ding‘ed up!

Check out chinaSMACK’s new Advertising section, featuring interesting recent advertising campaigns in China!

  • Alan no longer in China

    I thought they’d have Mao but I guess he doesn’t exactly fit in with Hitler and Stalin

    • Gun

      That is true, killing 70 million goyim cattle Chinese doesn’t even compare to 6 million “chosen” Jews getting it. I actually heard one ignorant piece of crap like yourself getting angry when I compared Mao with Hitler, told me he was “tired of people trivializing the holocaust by comparing it to the cultural revolution”. What is trivial about 70 million Chinese being killed? I guess that is trivial if you consider the only human life worth anything to be a Jewish life.

      • Frank

        First, where did you get the 70 million death toll figure?

        Second, “trivializing” the Holocaust doesn’t mean 70 million Chinese being killed is “trivial”. You’re getting mixed up.

        The basic difference between the Cultural Revolution and the Holocaust is a matter of intent and organization. The Cultural Revolution was mob class persecution and violence, instigated and sanctioned by Mao of course. The Holocaust, however, was systematic state instigated, organized, and executed genocide. There are similarities between the two but there are also differences. If you’re saying anything along the lines of the Holocaust being nothing compared to the Cultural Revolution, I wouldn’t be surprised if many people felt you were “trivializing” the Holocaust.

        • PeterScriabin

          The 70m figure seems to be the upper end of the roughly 40m-70m band produced by the most accurate research into the entire 27 years of Mao’s tenure. This includes not just the CR, but the various purges and campaigns of the 50s, the Great Leap of 1958-62 (alone responsible for 20-30m deaths according to Hungry Ghosts), and the continuing campaigns and purges of the 60s and 70s.

          I don’t see any evidence of Gun being mixed up in the way your 2nd paragraph suggests. He sounds angry, and his attack on Alan might well be construed as outrageously inappropriate, but he is quoting a separate argument, where we have no full account of what the interlocutor said.

          If it cannot be said that the deaths of the period 1949-76 were a result of “systematic state instigated, organized, and executed genocide” then I don’t know of what it could be said.

          I also don’t know if it’s fruitful or meaningful to make a league table out of Lenin, Stalin, Hitler, Mao and Pol Pot. The interesting thing is that the same mentality seems to have informed all these people and places at more or less the same period in history. The unimportance of human life and suffering, compared to the enforcement of life according to an Idea. The certainty of correctness, and the enjoyment of inflicting physical and mental pain on millions simultaneously.

          Perhaps people like the Big 5 have always been born in every period and place, and it was only the technology that had improved by the 20th century (as Orwell suggested in one of his essays)?

          With all that said, this “ad campaign” seems bizarre, and faintly disgusting.

          • Koji Kabuto

            sure, why not round it up to 100 million. it’s a lucky number!

          • Frank

            My mistake, I thought he was referring to the Cultural Revolution itself. If he meant throughout Mao’s rule, that’s fine.

            The mix up I’m referring to is his account of being accused of “trivializing” and then rhetorically asking if 70 million Chinese people was “trivial”. I felt he might be mistaking what “trivializing” means.

            I think there are differences between the violence perpetrated in the Holocaust and Mao’s rule. I don’t think, for example, that the 70 million Chinese people who died were targets of an state organized agenda of genocide any more than the French bourgeoisie were. On the other hand, the Jews were. This doesn’t mean the lives of the Chinese who perished are worth any less, it just means they were victims of a different sort of tragedy. I also don’t think that the vast majority of those Chinese died due to intentional systematic murder. The starvation deaths of the Great Leap Forward were due to bad policy and governance. Mao did not want those who perished in the Great Leap Forward dead like Hitler wanted the Jews dead. That’s a difference, and a meaningful one. The similarity is that a lot of innocent people died, and it is a meaningful one as well. We could make an argument for Mao on intellectuals, landowners, capitalists, etc. but that wouldn’t carry the same 70 million figure. No one is excusing Mao for the blood on his hands, but it is wise to be clear on how exactly they were culpable. Hitler and Mao offer different but valuable lessons.

            I agree with you on these people being misguided by ideology and that it isn’t useful to make a “league table” out of them. They should be appreciated or reviled for their crimes individually.

          • SQUAIDS

            That was some good referencing from wiki

            His source is SO legit

          • PeterScriabin

            Frank – your approach to all this sounds so reasonable and analytical. Responding to such as: “I also don’t think that the vast majority of those Chinese died due to intentional systematic murder.” and “The starvation deaths of the Great Leap Forward were due to bad policy and governance. Mao did not want those who perished in the Great Leap Forward dead like Hitler wanted the Jews dead”, I am going to have work hard to keep my emotions under control.

            If you cannot understand how a Communist regime somehow gets involved in the systematic murder of vast swathes of the people subjected to its dictates; if you are one of those who thinks that there is a legitimate agenda in Communism, which can somehow be separated from the systematic oppression and murder of people who are to be herded into living the Communist life – then, in the end, there is nothing anyone can do for you – beyond asking you to look at it all again for yourself until the ah-ha arrives.

            Very briefly: living in a totalitarian regime, at any given moment, there is only one correct way to think, to act and to live. One’s spoken and written words, actions and facial expressions must all be controlled at all times – on penalty of being suddenly and summarily denounced and removed from further participation. Even those who do their utmost to toe the line, and live selflessly as instructed, may suddenly be subjected to struggle, the Gulag and death, because of what they said or did earlier on behalf of the Party – because the Party line has been changed. And this is not incidental – because there is essentially no content to whatever the ideology of the Party (the Leader) promulgates – beyond the adulation of the Leader, and the constant renewal of His power.

            True, the lowest proles and peasants may not always be monitored so closely, but they are precisely the ones whose food can be collected and exported to the USSR, in return for military help, and the atom bomb. Even today, relatively few people, inside or outside China, have a firm grasp on what really happened, and how it was perfectly conscious policy. Almost everyone, no matter how educated or intelligent, seems willing to explain Mao’s actions as mistakes or accidents.

            Yeah, you’re right; Hitler’s agenda was far narrower and more systematic, Mao’s seemingly more selfless. However, both had for the very essence of their being, the organized and systematic brutalization and murder of a defined population. In a Communist society, there is a constant need to terrorize the people with new threats of violence – otherwise they become too comfortable, and the natural human tendency to pluralism and difference tends to creep back in. The leaders and followers of these new tendencies (Liu ShaoQi etc.) must then be purged, or the regime will die.

            So you seem to be making some sort of case for Hitler’s policies being worse? Personally, I’d rather have a couple of awful days standing in a cattle car, shitting in my pants, and then the merciful gas – than “live” for years under the constant, moment-to-moment fear of being denounced by some neighbor who wants my job on the local Party uniforms committee. [Personal note: my family were all European Jews.]

          • CC

            Why can’t you get off Hitlers back, Stalin was a bigger mass murderer than Hitler, the only reason nobody gives the Ruskies a dig is because they were on the winning team. For fucks sake the British have carried out some awful atrocities yet no one brings those up.

      • dopiate

        ur fucked…fall off already…the jews are in the middle of everything always…fuckthere is 100 times more chinese then there are anything else…70 million aint shit…

        • Lucifer

          70 millions, 40, 30, etc.. are not important figures. The only thing that matters is that in China Mao is still a hero..eheh…printed on every piece of paper money, the most sacred thing in China nowadays..

    • Type Two

      Yeah, these are great but where is Mao?
      Why doesn’t ChinaSMACK allow its commentators to post images?

  • karen

    uh huh. so the take-home message here is:

    don’t have sex with angry old men.

  • http://www.makeyourownpheromones.com Michael Hughes

    ah well regret it later

  • http://blog.minitofu.com Ministry of Tofu

    I wonder how they got a pic of Sis Feng with that kind of facial expression.

  • HaikuNoYume

    Actually, there’s a commercial belonging to this campaign, which is kind of creepy, better than the pictures, I find…
    http://vimeo.com/6502247

  • http://www.foarp.blogspot.com FOARP

    Yeah, China has to be one of the few countries in the world where even teeny-bopper girls of the kind who, in other countries, pay zero attention to politics or history, know who Joe Stalin is. It’s impressive how pervasive the propaganda is in China, so much so that the folks on nationalist-hole Tiexue seem surprised that he is regarded as a mass murderer in other countries – and even in the former USSR, even if there are plenty of people there who are willing to big him up as a ‘strong leader’.

    Someone once asked what the biggest difference between Taiwan and Mainland China is. I answered that in Taiwan, when you ask people who they most admire, especially young people, they will usually talk about either their parents, or movie/sports/pop stars. In China, on the other hand, the answers are universally the same – Deng, Mao, Zhou Enlai, and maybe some brave souls going with Zhang Xueliang. This is the difference between people who brought up in a free society and people raised by a system designed to enslave them.

    • Chef Rocco

      FOARP, you appear to be in line with “Nobly Educated Dickhead” ‘s (you know what I mean) propaganda.

      Personally, I don’t like Mao, but the bottom line is that the final judges of Mao’s historic status should be Chinese people, not some foreigners’ name-callings based on their ideological bias. In today’s China, as I observe, Mao is pretty controversial among intelligentsia, but among socially disadvantaged people as peasants and workers, Mao is still enjoying tremendous respects, and remember, many these are senior people who personally experienced Mao’s rule. You can’t say they were brainwashed by Mao and CCP, given many of them suffered from turbulence of Cultural Revolution.

      • PeterScriabin

        the final judges of Mao’s historic status should be Chinese people

        Why on earth so? Should the Jews be the final judges of Hitler’s “historic status” or the kulaks of Stalin’s? Especially when the very same political system system that perpetrated the unimaginable evils of the Chinese communists is still distorting and blocking the historical information necessary for “final judgment”? My girlfriend thinks Grandpa Mao was also starving during the Great Leap Backward, because that’s what she heard in school. I suppose Rocco will tell us that a foreigner, who tries to straighten her out, is a name-calling interferer in China’s internal affairs

        In general (and counter to FOARP’s bizarre notions about Chinese “teeny-bopper girls”) my impression is that Chinese youngsters know startlingly little about what happened in Russia, their own country and – let alone – Europe during the 1940s.

        Perhaps all of us would sacrifice a certain number of our own countrymen if we were told that doing so created a certain probability of a wonderful future society. Perhaps that number is larger for Chinese people than most other nations. Perhaps. Still doesn’t mean that others (outsiders) cannot judge the matter meaningfully.

        • Chef Rocco

          Peter, what makes you think westerners can dictate their judgment on Mao based on their values and ideologies to millions of Chinese people who lived under Mao’s rule and evaluate Mao based on their own life experience?

          Most People in China knows that CCP tries to extort and block historical information, but nowadays, information about Mao and cultural revolution is less sensitive, they are able to find more so-called “secrets” about Mao if they want. Many friends of mine read Zhang Rong’s book and “Mao’s Private Doctor”, though most of them are suspicious of reliability of these books.

          On the other hand, you really think the table league listing Mao along with Hilter is fair and without ideological bias? if you do, sorry to let you know that most Chinese people are very smart and pragmatic, while they don’t buy CCP’s propaganda, they follow the media guidance of so-called “the rest of world” neither.

          Just a side note, Mao didn’t starve during GLF, but he refused to eat meat for months according to his head bodyguard Li Yinhe.

          • PeterScriabin

            Rocco – I certainly do not expect to “dictate” my views to anyone, let alone the Chinese people, who are already world-renowned, gold-medal experts in living under dictatorships.

            I was responding to your “final judges” dictum. I got the idea you felt that any foreign view of the Mao era, no matter how well informed (and, unfortunately, many foreigners have a much better perspective on the true nature of Mao’s dictatorship than many of the workers and peasants who experienced its effects) was necessarily “some foreigners’ name-callings based on their ideological bias”.

            I think the “ideological bias” that foreigners may tend to have, as opposed to Chinese people (and here comes a massive generalization), is that, on the whole, it’s not OK to torture and kill people for the purpose of creating a better society in future. Mao’s perspective was that if it took a few tens of millions of deaths for China to have the atom bomb, well, so what? Plenty more where they came from. Or do you have some other “ideological bias” in mind?

            At bottom, I am merely saying that everyone, even foreigners, has the right to an opinion based on study and thought. At the present time, China is hardly the place for an objective discussion of the nature and effects of Mao’s rule, because (1) the facts and history necessary for such an appraisal are not freely available there (2) expression of opinions is heavily censored, as Grandpa Wen recently found out.

            Regarding Mao vs Hitler, have expressed my opinion elsewhere on this page, and will do so again, in response to Frank’s latest post.

          • Chef Rocco

            “many foreigners have a much better perspective on the true nature of Mao’s dictatorship than many of the workers and peasants who experienced its effects”

            Peter, you sound like a sanctimonious preacher with evangelic compulsion: “listen, you brain-dead Chinese, don’t believe what you are believing in, we foreigners are more well-informed than you because you don’t know the Book, we know!”

            I believe nobody in China cares what you think about Mao, but an advice to you, don’t tell the taxi driver who are driving you to airport that Mao is an evil person just like Hitler, it is highly likely that you would miss your airplane..

        • http://www.foarp.blogspot.com FOARP

          @Peter – Not ‘bizarre’, I asked a bunch of people who worked in a club I used to frequent in Nanjing back in ’04, every one of them could identify Stalin and Lenin, even the young ladies who were otherwise fixated on cheesy pop and glitter nail-polish.

          • PeterScriabin

            Identify? You mean little more than “they’d heard the names”? If so, I don’t think we’re arguing – I just meant that people I speak to here (in China) don’t quite seem to have heard the same 20th century history I got in my course. (But, it’s spotty. One time, I was trying to convince people cannibalism had been fairly common during the GLF, and no one was going for it – when suddenly my girlfriend (the same one who thinks Mao was starving) matter-of-factly came in on my side – but then, she’s from GuangXi).

            In any case, sorry about the “bizarre” libel. I’ve seen some of your other posts, and all too often you’re a lone, sane voice in a sea of…for example, that thread on guns a few months ago.

          • http://www.foarp.blogspot.com FOARP

            I mean, I pointed at a picture of them, and they told me who they were – they recognised the faces. When I asked one girl how they knew this, she answered that everyone knew who Stalin and Lenin were. This is not surprising, given that, as far as I am aware, pictures of them are displayed in every primary school.

          • http://www.foarp.blogspot.com FOARP

            @Peter – Understood – no, I’m not saying that they knew much more than they were prominent communists. But the fact they know them at all is what I’m trying to emphasise here. Compare this to the UK:

            http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/world-war-2/6034749/Teens-ignorant-of-WWII-poll-finds.html

          • A Chinese

            I found it weird that you intentionally point to a picture (which you carried?) of Stalin and Lenin and want strangers to identify them, in a club.

          • http://www.foarp.blogspot.com FOARP

            @A Chinese – Believe me, I don’t actually walk around carrying a picture like that, it was part of some artwork in the club. Nor were they ‘strangers’, I went there often and the people there knew me. But hey, if you’re just trying to make out that I’m some kind of weirdo, go ahead.

        • http://www.foarp.blogspot.com FOARP

          “the final judges of Mao’s historic status should be Chinese people”

          Great. Let’s ask some – I pick Jung Chang, Li Rui, and Bao Tong.

          • PeterScriabin

            ))):

            Apart from giving me a good laugh, as with the “glad to be of service” retort, your post allowed me to figure out (I think) how to quote others’ text little more neatly. The HTML tag is

            , according to the source. I’ll try it next time.

    • @@@

      (lame sarcastic tone) oh no… please superior white man, please use your all superior freedom, logic, judgement and universal valuse to save our poor repressed souls.

      cool story bro, you can keep worshipping paris hilton and i can worship Deng, i mean…. i’m doing it in my own country and i’m not judging you or anything….

      • http://www.foarp.blogspot.com FOARP

        Except the same people are also taught in school to believe that Taiwanese are brainwashed in school to be pro-independence, which is obviously not the case. Misinformation and propaganda in the Mainland Chinese education system doesn’t only affect Mainlanders, but also those whom the propaganda is directed against.

        • A Chinese

          > the same people are also taught in school to believe that Taiwanese are brainwashed in school to be pro-independence

          That’s not true. The political view of Taiwanese people on their own status is generally not taught in Chinese schools. Actually I would be surprised that political views of any country’s people would be taught in Chinese schools. I have been through Chinese education since elementary and I don’t remember anything remotely like that was taught to me.

          People’s Education Press, the organization that published textbooks for elementary, middle and high schools, have all their textbooks available online and you can go check by yourself:

          http://www.pep.com.cn/

          • http://www.foarp.blogspot.com FOARP

            Doesn’t cover university education, which is what i am talking about, but nice try.

        • @@@

          does it affect your white suburban middle class and your ability to subscribe to MTV so you can watch more paris hilton? propaganda, propaganda everywhere, simple minded folks like you sure like to use big words without fully knowing what they stand for, obama is a socialist? or maybe you just never set foot in a chinese school.

          i don’t give a shit about taiwan, but form what i can see on taiwaness tv, they are some fucking deranged people. i don’t need the big bad government to tell me that.

      • Master C

        Who’s China’s equivalent of Paris Hilton btw? Fauna, could you ferret out a lantern jawed ethnic Chinese (100% pure Han pls, not like Kong 78′s half breed insult James) hotel chain heiress as well who intends to build an ethnic Chinese named hotel chain worldwide for the Chinese to fawn over as well?

        Someone please invent a Chinese named Barbie Doll equivalent as well. Anglo-Saxon-Nordic is not Han. And ditch those wigs and anglo-law robes for Hanfu and Guan hat.

    • laselle

      i wondered did you really ask the questions in mainland china and taiwan? Do you really konw how young people think in mainland china? You are just selling your own point of view of china.

      • http://www.foarp.blogspot.com FOARP

        FYI – Yes I did. This was all back in my days teaching university English (this was before ’05, when I transformed into an over-worked, under-paid salary man), it was one of the questions I would ask in the oral exam given at the end of term. The answers in Mainland China were about 30% Deng, 25% Mao, 25% Zhou Enlai, 5% Zhang Xueliang, 15% other. The answers in Taiwan were about 10% Jay Chou, 10% Jolin Tsai, 10% teacher, 20% parents, 50% other.

        Now, you could argue that it’s a standard question to ask, and that the students were just giving pre-prepared answers, but the very fact that they would prepare a talk on Mao or Deng rather than someone more personally relevant says something.

        And yes, this is one unscientific sample of a few hundred Taiwanese and close on 2000 Mainland university students at one time several years ago. Still, I think it says something.

        • http://www.ethansenglishcafe.com Ethan

          I’ve also asked this in China of about 2000-3000 students and would agree with your numbers on who they say on the mainland, never asked in Taiwan though. I dont’ ask this question on exams anymore as it just got boring and repetitive.

        • A Chinese

          I’m surprised that the top ones were occupied by political leaders. Do you have the question like “who is your most admired leader” or similar for the poll? In my days in 90s, the most admired people by students were scientists, engineers and inventors such as Newton, Einstein and Edison. Though I have never heard a large scale survey like this, here’s an example of how Chinese students answer this question.

          Search the question “我最敬佩的人” (most admired/respected person) in Baidu’s Zhidao page (one where people answer others’ questions). I went through the first few pages to collect the answers. Most admired people are,

          1. a sanitation worker in the neighborhood
          2. a teacher
          3. brother
          4. friend
          5. a British little girl
          6. mom
          7. dad
          8. Fabio Cannavaro (a football player)
          9. grandpa
          10. a fairytale writer
          11. a traffic police
          12. a student that the author knows
          13. Lei Feng
          14. Ronaldo (another football player)

        • http://www.foarp.blogspot.com FOARP

          @A Chinese –

          “I’m surprised that the top ones were occupied by political leaders. Do you have the question like “who is your most admired leader” or similar for the poll?”

          No, as I said, the question was “who do you most admire?”. And, as you can see, I was not the only person to have this experience.

          This wasn’t a survey, it was an exam question, nor are the opinions of volunteers necessarily so representative of the opinions of the majority. This is not to say that asking university students is also necessarily representative of the opinions of the whole population, but it is certainly a representative sample of students in the relevant educational institutes at the time in question.

    • whichone

      Thank heavens there are critical thinkers such as yourself to point out flaws of the Chinese political system. Unlike the overwhelming majority of Chinese people who are obviously so intellectually inferior, you delight us with your insights. Thanks to your contemptuous comments regarding Chinese people, now us sheep can finally open our eyes and admire a person raised in a free society – smug internet revolutionary with delusions of expertise on Chinese social zeitgeist.

      • http://www.foarp.blogspot.com FOARP

        “Thank heavens there are critical thinkers such as yourself to point out flaws of the Chinese political system.”

        Glad to be of service.

      • Chef Rocco

        Agree, I believe FOARP is able to beat those stupid Wumao parties hands down…

  • ST

    Why use Obama in there? Genuinely don’t understand that one.

    • MAC

      Obama didn’t pull out of Afghanistan and Iraq on the day he took office, therefore he is in Hitler’s league.

      Personally, I’m not going to cry big tears about “netizens” photoshopping a president I voted for and am fairly please with, but I’m bugged by the hypocrisy. There are protests or at minimum a lot of pissing and moaning when Mao or even Hu is parodied.

      • ST

        “Personally, I’m not going to cry big tears”

        No, I understand and feel the same way. I just don’t understand why they would use Obama to compare with Hitler and Stalin (as opposed to rulers who have been in charge during times that saw the deaths of millions of their countrymen) and why Chinese people would think think it was reasonable. Is it just because he’s a powerful figure or do they despise him that much (in which case, why in the world would they feel that way?).

        • passing chinese

          because chinese just want to make fun of obama
          nothing else – they poke fun at USA all the time

          and they poke fun at themselves
          remeber – that was a chinese website where chinasmack got all the image

          no chinese in his right sense will consider using Mao – mao is controversial figure – please refer to chef rocco’s post
          still ALOT adore him – make no mistake

          i m surprised that foreigners like rocco actually know that much
          about my country

          • james

            rocco is right except for the part about telling a driver or anyone else that mao was no good. you can in fact tell a chinese this, as long as you do it on the grounds that it’s your personal opinion. most are open minded enough not to take it personally. but i do understand they would not put mao in this pictire. like most americans would not put lincoln.

  • Cleo

    Even their sly attempt at porno-ing sexual assault is crapped up and incompetent. Those Germans and their stupid rape mentality (look at the Oktoberfest costume – the sleeves are torn off the shoulder – the fabric covering the breasts are showcased and set apart from the rest of the costume. They were dying to use Mao as well but they dared to use Stalin who fought them back in World War 2 – the Romanovs are still alive – what does that say about the Soviet Union – it was all a ploy against the German skrulls. I also don’t think young people even in so called liberalized Europe should be exposed to a woman’s nipple – it is definitely insulting to woman. Why don’t they show a bunch of gay shots with HItler and leave other nationalities out of it. I am telling everyone who hasn’t noticed that the Germans are eager to lump Mao with Hitler – they always try to sneak it in even in lame interviews by Karl Lagerfeld.

    • no sense whatsoever?

      What the hell are you even talking about??

      • John Rabe

        She is saying: “Our dictator and mass murderer Mao was a better man than the German one.” Just another post along the lines that non-Chinese must not have any opinion on Mao.

    • dim mak

      whatthefuckamireading.jpg

  • http://www.地球.cn Kedafu

    imagine the picture…..

    me我 and Voice of China….. just giving it to him…..

    —–

    http://www.chinahush.com/2010/10/28/free-30-day-switch-vpn-accounts-giveaway/#more-7563

    —–

    dont worry about goubao

    you have to deal with me……

    real 五毛党 style 文明 (civilization)

    —–

    every comment you write I will make 50c replying to you!

    and shove it in your “dirty cunt” VOC voice of china…..

    the game is on comrade…..

    I just dropped this comment …..在中国。。。。。

    hush
    smack
    divide

    at the same time…..

    welcome to the 中国上网chingblogosphere roman coliseum

    in real time…..

    god damn I love the SMACK!!!!!

    —–

    song of the article…..

    U wait!

    Happy Halloween mother ….. !!!!!

    五毛党

  • Bill Rich

    But AIDS is not a STD in China. It is a hospital transmitted disease – through blood donation and transfusion. May be Hu poking a needle into Wen would be much better picture in China.

    • MAC

      China was in denial about HIV for years, but now not even the state media agrees with you:

      http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/china/2007-/29/content_6288359.htm

    • Master C

      In response to that, how would you feel if people said for a photoshop of Obama poking a needle into Joe Biden instead?

      China isn’t occupying any nation, though for that reason, I wouldn’t exactly support using Obama here to out of politeness.

  • James

    It’s amazing to me how many retarded people there are in the world who believe that AIDs was developed by the US. Immune Defficency Syndrome is naturally occurring! Cats and koalas can get it.

    • laselle

      yeah that’s true!!
      but i’m so sorry that the first AIDS was found in U.S

      • whichone

        First AIDS case was found in the United States because the disease is named in the United States. The virus responsible for the syndrome passed from Congo to Haiti to United States.

        A little context with the facts please.

        • laselle

          yes that’s right it is named in the US but what if the idiot just knew a little about this disease and misbelieved it was created by the Americans? i think there is no point of arguing the post that reveals the author’s stupid because i do believe there are a lot such idiots not just in china.

      • Monkey King

        The first of a lot of things were found in the US. It is a country of invention and discovery.

        It took China 20 years to even face up to facts about HIV/AIDS, let alone being world leaders in response to the disease.

    • A Chinese

      China has its fair share of holy war between fenqing (conservatard) and jingying (libtard). Chinese Internet is not much different from anywhere else in terms of ignorance and retardedness. Why make so much fuss?

      • http://vn.360plus.yahoo.com/pe_ngu_pe_ng0c_m0i_kh0c_vi_anh/ mjnh anh

        if you has some money you can’t do everthings but if you not you can’t makel..o..v..e so …………

        • http://vn.360plus.yahoo.com/pe_ngu_pe_ng0c_m0i_kh0c_vi_anh/ mjnh anh

          ax what ever???

  • Pingback: China site uses Hitler and Obama in aids ad - Stormfront

  • dopiate

    your idiots to think AIDS was created by Americans…we all know where it really came from Africa…duh…was bird flu created by Americans too..no…by the Chinese …cunt

    • laselle

      what you nazist pigs created? genocide? WAR?

    • Bob

      Retards across America believe WTC was blown up by the CIA, the moon landings were hoaxed in Area 51, and human civilization descended from Atlantis. Who cares lol.

  • http://procon-8.deviantart.com coconut

    Poor Sister Feng.

    She is like the Chris Chan of the Chinese Internet.
    Never to be left alone…

  • 大 李 飞 刀

    Old cow chewing young glass! 老 牛 啃 幼 草 !

    • 大 李 飞 刀

      Old cow chewing young grass! 老 牛 啃 幼 草 !

  • http://candosino.wordpress.com terroir

    Damn. Serial murderers get all the hottest chicks.

    • http://www.foarp.blogspot.com FOARP

      Plus one

      And some additional shit to get past the spam blocker.

    • fobulous

      seriously! I’d hit that.

      • http://candosino.wordpress.com terroir

        “First, you get the money. Then, you get the power. And then you get the women.”

        – Tony Montana, Scarface

        • fobulous

          The pink version:
          “First come the gays, then come the girls, then come the industry.” – Sex & the City.

  • sean

    perverted germans, italians, russians and chinese girls make a good pair for aids campaign

  • http://www.matthewsawtell.com Matthew A. Sawtell

    Hm… no spoof poster of Bush or Cheney? Looks like the P.R. Chinese are continuing that “fear the black foreigner” motif up.

  • Nereis

    Personally I feel confused when I saw the Obama photoshop. Even holding him to his worst, which is not pulling out of Afghanistan and Iraq the day he took office, he wouldn’t be held absolutely accountable. For one, unlike the dictators in the ads Obama doesn’t hold any power that can’t be vetoed or blocked by congress if it really wanted to. Witness the whole health care debacle. Perhaps Chinese people are confused about how much power the nominal head of state in any democratic nation really has. For example, in the Westminster system even the Prime Minister can be summarily ousted if he/she loses the support of the backing party come pre-election time.

    • Chad

      OR it was created in jest. There are plenty of photoshops of Obama with the Hitler stache floating around American message boards. So what?

      • nereis

        So the Obama photoshop lacks the political know-how to really get at home the message that democratically elected heads of state that espouse jingoistic rhetoric and declare illegal wars are just as bad as a dictator. A more apt comparison would have been the notoriously bad Bush years. Hence, the shop was no where near as witty as it could have been.

        • Master C

          USA is a representative democracy and thus not even truly an open system. *Participatory Democracy* is a process emphasizing the broad participation of constituents in the direction and operation of political systems.

          It avoids the concept of the people having a single view with the inevitable limitations that come from trying to agree what that view is. Government is heavily decentralized into smaller independent groups to allow personalized preferences within groups to be expressed in a functional manner PREFERRED by each particular group.

          The system seeks to avoid problems with centralized and electoral governance, while still providing a stable democratic system and ensuring all forms of human expression especially those diametrically opposed to be allowed expression. For example theocrat moralists / and sin industries (adult or gambling) can all be represented and functional even while proponents within each group do not use or believe in the other.

          All expressions will have their own place, albeit in a highly separated manner.

  • Bolle45

    AIDS wird nicht durch alte Männer, auch viele Junge haben sich
    AIDS geholt.

    Wer ohne Gummi bummst mus damit rechnen.

  • Cleo

    I thought it was illegal in Germany to use Nazi symbols and Hitler – did they change the law after “Austria” aka Germany aka Switzerland aka Germany Japan Axis recently “discovered” that Hitler had Jewish ancestry? Also, that girl looks like an uglified version of Kate Beckinsale.

  • bert

    These ‘ads’ are ridiculous and extreme. Anyway why is the “female’ so beautiful but of course the male figure is a horrible person? PCness here. Women don’t have disease or spread AIDS? God forbid that the truth be known about women and STD! Women can be dirty too! Oh my! How dare it be said!

    • dim mak

      Are there any female mass murderers?

      • bert

        I can’t think of a single one but behind every political mass murderer there was a woman. But collectively there are millions of dead babies due to irresponsibility. Oh yeah the non-p.c. holocaust, but can’t mention that to leftists, the saviors of the universe and oh so smart!

  • SG

    Whoever wrote that they believe AIDS was invented/created by Americans must be one of the stupidest people I’ve ever encountered. Try reading a book sometime. Then you might learn a little history.

    • y2k

      Africans are the most fervent believer of this theory.

  • chichi

    >> Actually, Western countries should take a
    >> photograph of American soldiers raping Iraqi
    >> women to promote AIDS prevention.

    That is a very good comment.

  • http://www.facebook.com/mea.dunford Mea Dunford

    … I’d never seen this before today. I live in the US. Consider this extremist. It is not MAINSTREAM. I guarantee you that 90% of America has never seen this. It’s not like a Dr Pepper commercial or something. Might as well have taken a picture of some of the horrible abortion billboards I’ve seen where they show dead a dead fetus. Having lost a baby in the 8th month of pregnancy, I find that particularly disturbing. This is a result of free speech, good things come and then awful things come. In the end remember it’s a fraction of our population, not all of us. 90% of us know better than to think this is an apt comparison. It’s the 10% of idiots out there who think they’re making a poignant statement when in reality their thrust vulgar comparisons The implication of RAPE in these posters is far more offensive to me personally though than the actual people being used to represent. This is more than just about killing and vulnerability. It paints a picture of violence and subjugation for women that as a subtext makes it almost “sexy”. That’s just my observation. No I’m not a “feminist” persay.. but I don’t think that the subliminal violence towards women message here is entirely unintended, and that it is meant to shock but instead seems counter-intuitive to that goal.

    Also, as an artist, I find this sort of shock value statement to be appalling. There are many more positive ways to address the issue. Also, politcal agendas are wrapped up in the views of these people, which makes their relative murdering subjective. Intelligent and malicious. AIDs is not a human entity, humanizing it diminishes the impact that it has on everyone, regardless of beliefs. AIDs is nondiscriminatory. It will kill whoever it can kill, and it has no moral justifications for the act. It’s a part of nature that, yes, we should seek to overcome, but no, not that we should poor hate towards instead of honest scientific discussion.

    Just some opinions.

Personals @ chinaSMACK - Meet people, make friends, find lovers? Don't be so serious!»