Comments on: North Korean 2010 World Cup Team Inspires Chinese Netizens

By: Kerry

Kerry — Thu, 02 Dec 2010 15:42:30 +0000

Jong Tae Se is a piece of shit. I watched a Journeyman Pictures documentary on him, apparently he lives a very comfortable life in Japan and is ignorant (or chooses to be ignorant) of the crisis in North Korea. When asked about N Korean defectors human rights, he made up all sorts of excuses to evade the real question, eventually maintaining that Japan is his “home” and he’ll never leave Japan. He’s not even interested in the political & human rights problems plaguing N Korea!

What does that tell us about his “loyalty”? All bullshit, used to stir up publicity for himself. Far as I see it, he’s shedding nothing but crocodile tears.

By: Koreansentry

Koreansentry — Tue, 29 Jun 2010 13:40:11 +0000

He already told S.Korean run Japanese media that he cried because he was just too happy tobe there at Worldcup, WC was his dream, he tried to join Worldcup squad for South Korea and Japan previously but denied due to his connection with Chongryon. After this incident, he and other four Korean-Japanese players will lodge their citizenship applications to either S.Korea or Japan. Besides, Jong himself is already S.Korean national.

By: hakucha

hakucha — Tue, 29 Jun 2010 05:52:11 +0000

i read so many comments here on north korean football team and their player zhend da shi but couldn’t get the point why people can’t be emotional for their country. i am 100% sure this guy is patriotic and thus tears roll over of his eyes as he is a part of the team which is representing their motherland. it is simple thing to understand. they are communist but hard working people. Who knows what they would be look like if were not sanctioned by USA for past so many decades. there is no rich or poor in this world cup. the quality matters most. i am asian and i fully supported north korean team and f**k u all who is talkin against this team bringing politics for ur benefits…….

By: Hongjian

Hongjian — Thu, 24 Jun 2010 18:29:58 +0000

Actually, the tactics of the DPRK team in the second game are said to have changed due to Kimmy’s own intervention.

The first game was defensive oriented in the 2-3-5 fashion, which worked great against Brazil.

The second game against portugal was a 3-4-3 placement – which is pretty ancient (60′s era tactic) and speaks out of unprofessionalism and antiquity.

After all, Kim is just a football-fan and not a real professional…

Some news even said that he guaranteed that the team wont be punished, if they lose the game by utilizing his idea.

By: Hongjian

Hongjian — Thu, 24 Jun 2010 11:44:42 +0000

“And why f**k are they so concerned about a soccer game when they are torturing, starving & killing their own people?”

Why the f**k is Germany so f**king concerend about their football match, while my former comrades are killing and dying in Afghanistan for the sake of magical ideals about freedum and durrmocracy? Why the f**k is South Korea so f**king concered about their football match, when their ASW corvette was sunk by some torpedo? Why the f**k is America so concerend about their foot- sorry, ‘soccer’ game, if their soldiers are killing, raping and dying in both Afghanistan and Iraq? Why the f**k do you give a f**k about anything, if sh*t is regularily hitting the fan somewhere out there?

“When did China exists as a capitalistic country? Are you saying China is a capitalistic country NOW? I hope you are not saying that; to be capitalistic you must have free market with rules and regulations, personal land ownership (Title and laws to protect it), free trade and limited government interference. China does not have any of the above…China IS NOT a capitalistic country.”

Sorry kid, Capitalism does not require ‘rules and regulations’ – it is called Socialism and Interventionism, if the state has to set rules and regulate the markets.
Dont pretend that you know the exact definition of capitalism – since there are absolutely none. Read wikish*t for further instructions:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capitalism

“There is no consensus on the precise definition of capitalism, nor how the term should be used as an analytical category. There is, however, little controversy that private ownership of the means of production, creation of goods or services for profit in a market, and prices and wages are elements of capitalism.”

Above requirements are well within the current Chinese ‘socialist market economy’:

Private ownership of means of production = (Foxxcon and even fucking Geely own their manufacturing means and other machines) Check.
Creation of goods or services for profit in a market = (Dunno lol. I just pretend to have never seen Chinese services or goods in the domestic market) Check.
Prices and wages = (Nothing is free in China and even slave-wages are still wages) Double Check. Duh.

Capitalism = Check.