Chinese Fishing Boat Captain Released By Japanese, Reactions

Chinese fishing boat captain Zhan Qixiong arrives in China on a government chartered plane after being detained 17 days in Japan.

From NetEase:

Chinese fishing boat captain returns to the country 17 days after being captured and arrested by the Japanese

September 25 morning, Zhan Qixiong, the fishing boat captain that was illegally arrested by the Japanese in the waters around Diaoyu Island, returned to Fuzhou aboard a flight chartered by the Chinese government. Zhan Qixiong emotionally said, “To be able to safely return, I really thank the Party, the government, and the people of my country for their concern for me.”

Chinese fishing boat captain Zhan Qixiong arrives in China on a government chartered plane after being detained 17 days in Japan.

September 25th, Zhan Qixiong boards the Chinese government chartered plan to return to Fuzhou, China, making a “victory” sign in front of the cabin door.That morning, 17 days after being captured and arrested by the Japanese in the waters around Diaoyu Islands, the Chinese fishing boat captaign Zhan Qixiong traveled by Chinese government chartered plane safely back to Fuzhou.

Chinese fishing boat captain Zhan Qixiong on a government chartered plane returning to China after being detained 17 days in Japan.

September 25th, 1:12am, escorted by a joint task-force organized by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Department of Agriculture, Chinese fishing boat captain Zhan Qixiong boards a Chinese government chartered airplane to return to the country. Zhan Qixiong emotionally said, “To be able to safely return, I really thank the Party, the government, and the people of my country for their concern for me.”

Chinese fishing boat captain Zhan Qixiong arrives in China on a government chartered plane after being detained 17 days in Japan.

September 25th, 4am, the Chinese fishing boat captain Zhan Qixiong (front) steps off the Chinese government chartered plane, safely returning to Fuzhou. Zhan Qixiong said, “The Japanese capturing and arresting me is illegal. Diaoyu Islands is Chinese territory, I strongly support the government’s position.”

Chinese fishing boat captain Zhan Qixiong reunited with family after being detained 17 days in Japan.

September 25th, Zhan Qixiong (front right) reunited with his wife and son who came to welcome him back. At 4am that day, the Chinese fishing boat captain Zhan Qixiong who was captured and arrested by the Japanese safely returned to Fuzhou on a Chinese government chartered plane. After the cabin door was opened, Zhan Qixiong quickly got ff the plane and tightly embraced his relatives who were waiting at the airport holding flowers. He returned with a task force comprised of Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Department of Agriculture, and other relevant department staff.

Chinese fishing boat captain Zhan Qixiong arrives in China on a government chartered plane after being detained 17 days in Japan.

September 25th, Zhan Qixiong (left) shaking hands with staff waiting at the airport. That day, Assistant Minister of Foreign Affairs Hu Zhengyue and Fujian Vice Governor Hong Jiexu waited at the airport to receive/welcome back.

Chinese fishing boat captain Zhan Qixiong arrives in China on a government chartered plane after being detained 17 days in Japan.

September 25th, Zhan Qixiong (front right) leaves the chartered plane accompanied by his wife, son, and relevant staff. Japan’s Okinawa Naha district prosecutor’s office decided on the 24th to release and return while the right to still prosecute the captured and arrested Chinese fishing boat captain Zhan Qixiong. While responding to reporters’ questions on the 24th, China’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs spokesperson Jiang Yu reiterated that any so-called legal proceedings carried out by the Japanese against the Chinese fishing boat captain are illegal and invalid.

Comments from NetEase:

网易浙江嘉兴网友:

Have we won?
He should never have been arrested/detained for even a day, and to think that they only released him after 17 days!

网易欧洲网友:

Japanese are a people who deserve a beating. Whoever dares to treat it arrogantly, unreasonably, roughly, and imposingly is whoever it will fear. Let’s set aside that Japan fears American because America has defeated Japan before and just talk about Russia, whom Japan also fears greatly. The reason is because Russia, during the Soviet Union period, was very ruthless resulting Japan having a lingering fear of Russia to this day. Therefore, the strategy with Japan must be: Sometimes, Japan must be given a taste of the stick, and not always give it the carrot.

网易上海徐汇网友:

[I] really do not understand how you guys can be happy [about this], the rest I won’t say, as saying it would be useless, and unable to be posted~

网易陕西西安网友:

Bastards who don’t know what is good for them, now they’ve been put in their place. Little Japan, remember that it is no longer 1937′s September 18th. [This netizen is confused, "918" was in 1931, but the war is officially 1937.]

网易山东济宁网友:

Little devils remember: The Chinese people will never compromise on issues of territorial sovereignty!

网易福建厦门网友:

[I] welcome the hero home.

网易山东网友:

In the past, I used to feel pride in being Chinese, but today, I feel ashamed!

网易中国网友:

Would being more low-key kill [you, Zhan Qixiong]? Even making “victory” signs, idiot!

网易天津网友:

Well-done Big Brother Zhan (even though I am older than you)! Let’s go [to the Diaoyu Islands] again next time, because in our territory, we go where we please, not afraid of those Japanese dogs’ bullshit ships. Tell me when you will set sail next time? We’ll go together!!

网易广东广州网友:

This kind of person should not be brought back. What kind of hero is so obviously shameless, going off causing trouble hitting other people’s ships. Can’t you be patriotic in a more civilized manner? Such an embarrassment and you still have the face to come back.

网易浙江温州网友:

How can this kind of person be called a hero? Some netizens’ comments are truly disgusting.

网易四川网友:

Have the author and editor been confused by their anger, even confusing “detained” with “arrested”, one [Chinese] character of difference, but one large difference in connotation! Better carefully review before publishing because, after all, you are the mainstream media, you shouldn’t make stupid mistakes! When Jackie Chan says something wrong and the media and Chinese people don’t approve/agree, at least he dares to come out and face it. What about NetEase then? It should apologize to the people even more!

网易浙江宁波网友:

This is a hero? Arrested by little Japan for 10 days? And he’s still happy? Truly without integrity. Sigh, a national tragedy.

网易火星网友:

Japanese products have good quality, so what if I buy them, I like to use good things. The country [China] has nothing to do with me, corrupt officials running wild everywhere, what use is me being patriotic as one person? A fishing boat captain detained for 17 days was released, would you guys still celebrate if your family member was unjustly detained for 17 days? And rejoicing so exuberantly? Truly a country where there are more SB than normal people.

网易福建莆田网友:

Normal posts are all deleted. [Yet] SB posts all get approved.

网易山东青岛网友:

From beginning to end, I didn’t see how this embarrassed Japan. Nor did I see how they were taught a lesson…[everyone here is just] YYing on their own…

网易浙江温州网友:

The captain is wearing a new shirt, the creases from the folds are still there.

  • Alex

    The only reason that he was released is that the chinese arrested 4 japanese “spies” and spies get executed in china.

    So this was won by blackmail:
    4 innocent japanese people for 1 idiot that rammed a japanese boat.

    • Alex

      Details about the “spies” caught in china
      http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2010/09/23/ap/asia/main6894076.shtml

    • Chad

      Not so sure he rammed the Japanese boat. The Japanese said the same thing about a Taiwanese fishing boat in 2008 and arrested him. Video evidence later showed they actually rammed HIS boat and sank it.

    • Chef Rocco

      How do you know the four Japanese “innocent”? by guessing?

      • CAINE

        Chef Rocco,

        How do we know the four Japanese innocent by guessing? Any sensible guy won’t question that?

        Don’t u find too funny to capture FOUR japanese spies when they are negotiating release of fisherman, WHY NOW what never before??? why just now why only JAPANESE, all these things might be coincidence but it is NOT coz CHINA ALWAYS PLAY DIRTY

    • Joe

      You have no way of knowing they were not spies. Your assumption that they were innocent is clearly biased.

      • Something Something

        Biased? Why would that be? Rio Tinto does what every other bastard in the country is doing and only when the company is suddenly in a dispute over iron ore prices is their China head in trouble for economic espionage. Chinese captain plays bumper cars off some uninhabitable piece of rock smack dab in the middle of nowhere is arrested and then suddenly 4 Japanese buisness men get tossed in the clink? Lets not be naive here.

        • anon

          Based on the information we have available, we have no way to determine if the 4 Japanese are actually guilty of what the Chinese claim (intentionally taking photos of what they’re not allowed to), are guilty of part of what the Chinese claim (they were in the wrong area at the wrong time), or being falsely accused as a tool in a larger political strategy against Japan.

          That many people are suspicious of the Chinese government regardless shouldn’t come as a surprise to even the Chinese government. Likewise with them thinking the timing is anything but a coincidence.

          Nonetheless, that’s still just suspicion and not fact.

          As for Rio Tinto, I would dispute that every other bastard in the country was doing what they were doing. Protectionist industrial policy where certain information is heavily guarded and not allowed to be publicly released, specifically in the industry Rio Tinto was in, is something that Rio Tinto was well aware of. They made their choices understanding the risks and they got caught. Businesses operate according to their market environments, not the other way around. It may not be “fair” to you but that’s reality. Few things are fair in reality whether in China or anywhere else. Every day we can find “unfairness” built into society. It’s one thing to advocate change but another thing to advocate change after you’re caught.

          Something Something has reasons for being biased, but that doesn’t mean that products of that bias are necessarily true. He knows that.

          • Something Something

            My friend let’s not be naive. In the Rio Tinto case the company was using market data which was perfectly legal and acceptable six months before the case but then was arbitrarily declared a secret. The information in question was simply public knowledge that was later turned into a “secret” to make a prosecution of paper thin logic available to the Chinese government. Rio Tinto was complete bullshit in the eyes of the community, the law, and the world. When I say every other bastard I mean just that. Every company in the market at the time was and still is doing the same things. They just didn’t happen to be in tense negotiations with the Chinese government over iron ore prices.

            In this case a Foreign Ministry sanctioned group of Japanese specialists who’s unlucky task it is to clean up spent munitions and chemical weapons left over from the Japanese occupation at the behest of the Chinese government are locked up for taking photographs they no doubt took under close supervision by party handlers in whatever situation they were in. The accusation that they are spies is more ludicrous than a Dan Brown novel. That anyone with even a smidgin of brain capacity could believe the Chinese governments accusations is only more insane. Biased? We’ve hanged people for murder with less circumstantial evidence. I’m not a gambler at all and I would stake my fortune on both of these cases being nothing other than what they seem.

            As to the proof to make my accusations fact? You and I both know that in the better interest of one party they’ll likely never come up. When they do it’ll be far too late for any action taken to matter.

      • 3rd Party?

        As a young, naive outside, I’d like to just share my skepticism that there would be four spies TOGETHER.

  • 大 李 飞 刀

    It’s time for China to stand up against the JAP!!! It’s time to show the world China is no longer weak like in Stupid Ching dynasty time.

    • mylo81

      Are you crazy or what??? we are not in XX century anymore!!! I’m european and we dont hate german people because of Hitler!!! Your Communist Government is hypocritical to say that the Japanese violated the human rights of the fisherman … your government does it every day and you dont do nothing! they love to promote your hate to the Japanese, its better for the party! this way you dont think about the shit that’s in your own country.

      • mylo81

        With “shit” I mean “problems”
        And one last thing:
        “Few people can be happy unless they hate some other person, nation, or creed.”
        Bertrand Russel

    • CAINE

      CHINA IS STILL STUPID JUST LIKE CHING DYNASTY TIME,

  • Mahoujojo

    As usual China is using any dirty trick they can to get what they want.
    I have no respect for these kinda politics, capture 4 tourists to put them under pressure, shameful. But they don’t even know what word or care about it.
    Japan should have said release them or declare war on Japan and USA. United they could destroy them.

    • Bob

      Lol. Japan asking the US to have a war with China.

      • Jordan

        Hey, that sounds good, and the US will borrow more money from China to pay for the war.

        • mrsleep

          That’s rich. China doesn’t have any money, that was siphoned of by party leaders a long time ago.

          The yuan valuation is based on whatever the party says it is, not what the markets say.

          The only reason you think China is rich, is cause the US pumps billions into your economy every year, but you see, we can take those billions elsewhere, and will if its cheaper.
          The US makes money, creates markets, invents products, China relies on trade, trade can dry up.

          Just ask countries in the Caribbean whats its been like since their US trade dried up.

          • Bchung

            Considering that 50% of your tax revenues will be used to PAY THE FUCKING INTEREST ON YOUR DEBT. Continue to go on ranting… you and your dumb shit economic knowledge.

            Dumb ass yank tell me whats the difference between the Biggest CREDITOR AND DEBTOR?

            China is definitely not rich, but the American Children, grand children and future generation will got plenty of debt before they are even born…. go on start bitching cracky HOE!!!!!!!!!

  • Simon

    Look at those wacky eyes – this guy is some thing. The game just started, lets see what turns out.

    I thought fujianers only good at human smuggling, didn’t know they fish as well. Oh yea, fishing at Diao-yu-tai “fishing-platform” island !! No mistake here!!!

    • anon

      Might want to brush up on your knowledge of Fujian and Fujianese people then, as well as the history of Taiwan.

  • hahaha

    Lols
    Another post about this notes the timing of events that unfolded
    Guy was arrested by Japan for criminal charges => China threatens => China threatens to block export of rare minerals to Japan => China captures 4 Japanese “spies” and state that they will be prosecuted (max sentence for this crime is death lol)=> Japan frees man => China celebrates (look above) and demands an official apology and some monetary sum for its illegal actions => (in the near future) 4 “spies” will be prosecuted.

    Note:
    By legal treaties/etc., this area belongs to Japan.

    Also, note that before oil was found in the area, no one really cared about it hahahaha.

    @Chef Rocco
    Coincidence is one thing, but this isn’t it rofl. I mean 4 “spies’ were identified and captured in like a week? hahahaha

    • Bob

      By legal treaties etc, this area was administered under Taiwan, which Japan returned to China after they got nuked.

      • TehHova

        By legal treaties etc, this area was administered under Taiwan, which Japan handed over to the USA to after they got nuked.

        Fixed that for you. China does not own Taiwan, it is a US military occupied territory.

      • Chunghwa

        A 1944 Tokyo Court ruling stated that the islands belonged to Taihoku Prefecture (Taihoku = Taipei in Japanese), following a dispute between the local governments of Okinawa and Taihoku Prefectures.

        But then, when Taiwan was given to the ROC, why were the Senkakus/Diaoyus made administered under Okinawa Prefecture again?

  • Cool Matt

    Complete Bullshit. Fishermen are the nongmin of the sea. Only thing he knows is what he learns in school and what govt spoon feeds him every day. Knowing this, is it really so hard for some Chinese to believe that he RAMMED the Japanese boats?

    Notice on the news here in China, you only hear “collision” which takes away any motive. Some actually think the Japanese rammed the fishing boat. Blindly following the govt sponsored news reports. This is the value of slandering the “Western media” (AKA every other country’s media)in the past. Chinese will start to only believe CCP news reports are legit.

    Of course arresting the boat captain had no legal basis, but did intentionally ramming two Japanese vessels? If i hit two people in my home, is it right because its my house? But this is what happened and what so many Chinese refuse to believe it or don’t care. They only care about the result of the captain’s violence.

    If there was an investigation into what caused the arrest of the fishing captain, i guarantee you China would not like the result. Just like North Korea didn’t like it.

    If the Japanese somehow let the captain return home right after hitting their ships, he would return a hero. Instead, he saw the consequences of his actions and instead of understanding the circumstances, a bunch of Chinese started waving the flag instead of seeing Japan’s point of view.

    Can you imagine if a Japanese fishing boat started ramming Chinese boats. Some Chinese would be livid. But Japan isn’t supposed to be angry and instead accept that getting hit by another boat (Twice) is allowed. Only China is allowed to be upset? Time for China to stop playing the victim card and accept that being Chinese does not make China automatically right, just as being American does not make what America does right.

    In this case, the Japanese did not act without reason. They were attacked and had to defend themselves. Just because China says they are peaceful does not mean every citizen is.

    • Chad

      You’re joking right?

      Um, how did you already come to the conclusion the Chinese fishermen rammed the Japanese boats. I’ve read many types of media (Canadian, Arab, American, British) and they’ve all reported that it was only a collision. For you to think only Chinese media are calling it a collision just shows how ignorant you are right off the bat.

      And let’s see.. you’re asking if it’s hard to believe the Chinese fisherman rammed the Japanese boat. I’ll ask you if it’s hard to believe Japanese patrol boats rammed the Chinese fishing boat. Why? Because the same thing happened to Taiwanese fishermen in 2008.

      • Cool Matt

        I didn’t come to any conclusion. Im just using what I have seen from conclusions of reporters. Conflicting reports between China and the rest of the world.

        I didn’t mean to emphasize “collision” as so much as the fact that he hit 2 Japanese boats. Not one. Sorry for the poor example but its like saying planes collided with the WTC on 911. Not false but not telling the whole story.

        I’m not saying you didn’t but what source outside of China reported the Captain hitting only one boat?

        I’m saying it because Japanese and Chinese fishers see eachother on a daily basis. Why suddenly would 2 Japanese patrol boats, part of the millitary, decide to attack this insignificant fishing boat suddenly?
        Ask yourself who is more likely to be so erratic? a well trained military force, or, could it be that one uneducated and uber-patriotic fisherman from China acted on his own?

        Again, all hypothetical, but there will never be an investigation, like i said before, because something tells me China won’t like the results.

        • anon

          Let’s just wait for the Japanese to release the video footage that they say will settle the dispute over who “rammed” who. I’m sure the video should also make clear if it was intentional ramming or if it was just an accident. The Japanese previously would not release it citing it as evidence in the prosecution’s case. If they’re not going to prosecute the captain anymore, then they can release. What those of us looking to settle the dispute should be worried about is if they never release the video. There are possible reasons for this: 1) It shows that the Chinese fishing boat did not intentionally ram them; 2) It shows the Chinese fishing boat did and proving such would piss off an unreasonable Chinese government; 3) other possible reasons you can imagine.

          I unfortunately suspect that there will be a high probability of the video never being released and we will never know why exactly (whether to benefit Japan or to appease China, etc.).

          • Cool Matt

            Right, and IF it does show the Chinese boat ramming, it would never be officially shown in China. It would be a major embarrassment to China. Make them lose face. And as we all know, face is more important than accountability.

            Totally ruin the facade of the “victimization” of the boat captain and totally blow a hole in his “human rights violations” accusations which is hilarious to begin with coming from China.

            Still we don’t know anything and it could be the other way around.

          • Bob

            the Japanese already released the captain because they “did not perceive any premeditated intent to damage the patrol boats”

          • dim mak

            I’m 100% sure the video won’t change a thing because people will just make up their own interpretations. This is really more about nationalism than anything else.

          • anon

            Really? I haven’t seen that yet as the reports I’ve read all emphasize the Japanese side’s unwillingness to further deteriorate China-Japan relations. If the Japanese explicitly say that they don’t think there was an intent to ram the Japanese Coast Guard ships, that’s a key detail.

          • Chad

            Just googled “did not perceive any premeditated intent to damage the patrol boats” They did indeed state this in a BBC article. But the argument again is if their government just doesn’t want to admit they caved in to chinese pressure. It’d be much better to say it was all just an accident. I would like to see them release that video footage of theirs though.

            On another note, it’s becoming increasingly clear to me by now this is just a political game by the US and Japan.

        • Chad

          “I didn’t come to any conclusion. Im just using what I have seen from conclusions of reporters. Conflicting reports between China and the rest of the world. ”

          Right. Show me the conflicting reports. I’ll show you a dozen non-Chinese reports calling it a COLLISION- the offending word you have a problem with. Lying scum.

          • Cool Matt

            Woah. Easy Chad. If you kept reading that post you are upset at, you would see that i have no problem with the word “collision.” I’m definitely sure you will find it in non-Chinese reports.
            My problem is when reports don’t go into details about how the collision happened. I find that alot of Chinese articles say there is a collision and move on without saying how it happened or why he was arrested.

            Obviously if the fisher was at fault, it still wouldn’t make his detainment legal, but it would at least add some understanding to the Japanese motive behind doing it. Instead, so many people think its just Japan causing trouble for the sake of causing trouble and blindly get angry because they never had a chance to hear the entire story.

            Bad journalism=Ignorant Citizens. But then again, state sponsored journalism is inherently bad, isnt it?

            I’m not saying any side is right. Im just saying, a little perspective goes a long way. Let individuals decide how to feel after seeing both sides point of view instead of presenting them with one state sponsored view.

          • Chad

            Again, show me conflicting reports or I’m going to have to believe you were just making **** up. Every non-Chinese media report I’ve read has called it a collision between the chinese fishing boat and 2 japanese patrol boats and nothing more about how the collision happened. Why? Because that’s still up in the air what actually happened. Japan said they had video evidence earlier to explain detaining the man, but they are now not releasing this video evidence for whatever reason.

            In fact, I’ll turn it around by saying that Japanese news reports are the ONLY ones outright saying the Chinese guy rammed into the patrol boats ironically enough.

    • Chef Rocco

      All your logic is based on who actually rammed whom first, Chinese or Japanese? But you skipped a very important prerequisite: why did these ships meet there at first?

      The Chinese boat was there to fish assuming they were in Chinese territory, the Japanese ships were there to stop fishing and drive out the Chinese boat from their presumable territory. Because there were territorial dispute, the Chinese fishing boat justifiably was not obeying the Japanese order. Under the circumstances, the collision was just a natural result of the conflict. Whatever actually happened, the captain shouldn’t be subject to Japanese domestic law and was arrested.

      • Cool Matt

        Quick question Rocco. Japanese fishing boat rams Chinese navy in same area? What should be done to Japanese fisher?

        Taking into account of course, that Japan feels just as strongly about the islands as China and the argument you just presented to me.

        • Rocco

          Matt, If Chinese navy enters the same area to drive out Japanese fishing boats, Japanese navy would come to challenge Chinese ships, more seriously, a military skirmish might turn into an all-out war between the two countries. We still care what should be done to Japanese fisher for their role in the conflict then?

    • Pasha

      @ Cool Matt, smart points. I’ve often heard from Chinese, oh well if it’s on CCTV it MUST be true!:) I won’t even go into that bastard of a reporter on CCTV9/NEWS.

      China’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs spokesperson Jiang Yu reiterated that any so-called legal proceedings…blabla, yadayada..

      As for this, Jiang Yu uses “reiterate” whether it is the USA, Australia, Japan, Russia or the UK at the end of China’s wrath. And most foreigners will know that “so-called” legal proceedings in China are just that, contracts to name one.

      • Cool Matt

        Oh man, don’t get me started with Jiang Yu. Granted she is a mouthpiece but i haven’t respected her since she said “China’s internet is open” at a press conference awhile back. see here:
        http://tinyurl.com/2f7og4t

        On an unrelated, sexist note, you find her hot at all? She’s kinda got that Sarah Palin thing going on. Disagree with political views but both look like sexy librarians.

        • Pasha

          Hehe, I’ll refrain from making a Vladimir Zhirinovsky type comment about how she needs to be taken to the UK army barracks and given a good seeing too:-)

    • Cool Matt

      Hi Chad. Here is the Japanese side from an American source.
      http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703793804575512543702131502.html

      In it, it says the captain admitted to ramming the boats

      But you’re right. I can’t find any conflicting reports on the Chinese side because they aren’t mentioning it. Only mentioning that they are upset at the result of it.

      And Chinese media wonders why it isn’t respected? The only thing worse than unintentionally reporting things wrong, is intentionally not trying to report the full story.

  • Xero

    Well at least the netizens were humble………………………

  • Shanghairen

    That guy just looks like a guy that doesn’t drive carefully at all and crashes into things.

    The Chinese find a scroll or coin with Chinese writing on it a couple miles off the coast of Vietnam, Malaysia, Indonesia or Brunei and there’s proof that it once belonged to China (and therefore in an inalienable part of the Motherland).

    • lang

      Agreed! Well said.

    • Chad

      Actually, this is one of the rare instances where the territory in question was stolen from China not so long ago.

      • Something Something

        They’re giant rocks with some vegetation on them. In the thousands of years of human civilization no one has tried to live on them. They sit precisely between Okinawa prefecture and Taiwan with nothing around for about 200 kilometers in every direction. Only due to a oil/gas survey in the sixties does anyone actually care about this place. Before that they were ‘noted’ I said ‘noted’ by Chinese and later foriegn sailors. If I see something in space and take note of it, but never actually land on it, live on it, or use it for any purpose how does this make it mine? I mean this isn’t Israel/Palestine we’re talking here.

        • anon

          The fact that no one actually lands, lives on, or really uses the Diaoyu Islands actually tends to help or hurt ALL parties claiming it (China, Japan, and Taiwan).

          I find the Wikipedia summary of the arguments to be far more meaningful than the cherry-picked bits and pieces people are presenting here for both sides.

          • Cool Matt

            Nobody gives a crap about the islands. Only Japan cares about the oil under them. China doesn’t give a crap about the oil, but the fact that Japan is doing business so close to the mainland.

          • Moo

            When did Wikipedia become an authority on history and facts?

          • anon

            Well, Moo, I happen to ascribe authority to Wikipedia in this case because it does a good job of including and summarizing the various arguments pertinent to this issue with citation to primary sources. If you don’t like that (and it sounds like you don’t), you’re welcome to offer us something more comprehensive while giving an argument for why you think we should recognize it as a higher authority. Of course, we reserve the right to disagree with you if you’re not persuasive. Either that, or ask you when your proffered “authority on history and facts” became such an authority. You up for the challenge?

  • Wago

    National hero? Thanks to him, now every foreign country and overseas company are gonna aggressively seek alternatives to doing business in China.

    • Tee Dee Ang

      That captain lost humilty and appreciation of his people’s help efforts and worries for him. How stupid and selfish he looked when he arrived home! Does his stupid V sign mean China”s
      integrity and moral value?

  • dim mak

    I guess a lot of people don’t follow events outside of Asia… Most arrests made over territorial disputes end with a quick, unconditional release regardless of pressure or diplomacy. I doubt they would’ve ever kept him for trial or imprisonment.

  • dongshizhang

    wow what a hero. he was boldly captured and then safely returned. if he hadn’t kept breathing and eating he may have perished, or at least been a little fatigued. The mission required a task force. I would have opted for an unruly pack of chengguan.

  • catdrugs

    Solve the problem of territorial disputes of east asian islands (diaoyu/senkaku, dokdo/takeshima, etc.) by destroying them with large amounts of conventional explosives.

  • outcast

    China and Japan truely deserve eachother.

  • Hans

    reading all of this, i thought i’d post the same thing again for arguments sake:

    The Senkaku Islands comprise five small volcanic islands and three rocky outcroppings with a total land area of just seven square kilometres. They were first discovered and mapped by Japanese explorers and finally were formally incorporated into Japanese territory in 1895. A number of surveys have been conducted on the islands, and no trace of any previous habitation or prior ownership has ever been found. Since 1895, the islands have continuously remained as an integral part of the Japan’s territory.

    In 1895, China and Japan also jointly signed the Treaty of Shimonoseki, in which the Emperor of China stated that: “China cedes to Japan in perpetuity and full sovereignty of the Penghu group, Taiwan and the eastern portion of the bay of Liaodong Peninsula together with all fortifications, arsenals and public property.” The Chinese now claim that the Treaty of Shimonoseki wasn’t fair, and refuse to recognise it today. They now claim that all the bits they ceded away are still theirs, regardless of the fact that they ceded them away in an internationally-recognised document. By their reckoning, therefore, the Senkaku islands are still part of China. Except, and here’s the kicker, that the Senkaku Islands were never part of the Pescadores group of islands that were ceded to Japan in the first place. As a result of this small and inconvenient truth, the Senkaku Islands were not included in the territory which Japan renounced under Article II of the 1952 Francisco Peace Treaty. They were instead placed under the administration of the United States as part of the Nansei Shoto Islands, in accordance with Article III of that treaty, with the United States later handing administrative rights back to Japan.

    ~

    • Peter in China

      Hans please shut the fuck up. If that “treaty” is legal, then I guess extortion and coercion is legal under international law too! The First Sino-Japanese War was started by Japan simply because it was fucking paranoid that China had too much influence over Korea and therefore a threat to Japanese interests. Japan and its war mongering ways can go fuck itself.

  • 2CH reactions

    2ch reactions from the japanese version of chinasmack

    Look, they won’t stop.

    Why couldn’t those idiot Democrats see this would happen?

    I could tell this would happen but still… it’s like they keep stamping on Japan’s head even as they grovel in front of them.

    The people who didn’t realise this would happen are complete idiots. I feel sick.

    The whole nation is a gangster nation. Unbelievable.

    This is the result of the “dialogue” the leftists wanted.

    You can’t call yourself a country if you don’t have power.

    Hurry up and get nukes. This can’t go on.

    The ones who ordered this release committed an act equivalent to state treason.

    What an age we live in – you can expand your territory and demand money just by bashing into someone’s ship.

    The diplomacy of prostration has begun. The wonders of a nation with no army.

    Now they’ve seen a weakness they’re just going to keep demanding more and more.

    The government and prosecutors should apologise by committing seppuku.

    I didn’t think they be so blatant. Now they’ve shown everyone what they’re really like. The Chinese are just too base and mean a people, you can’t deal with them.

    Say something Agnes!

    What a genius, this fishing boat captain. Without a shot fired or a drop of blood spilt he stole the Senkaku Islands – amazing.

    If we pay anything it’ll be handing our claim over the islands to China.

    Next it’ll be Okinawa. Then Kyushu, Shikoku, Hokkaido, Honshu…

    I didn’t realise China was so crude a nation – I’ve lost all hope in them. I can’t believe a nation like this is a standing member of the UN security council.

    And they still have the 4 hostages…

    Amazing JDP diplomacy. They didn’t even manage to get a promise of no further demands in return for releasing him. I can’t believe how stupid they are.

    This is a good stimulus for a peace addled Japan – you can get whatever you want with only words if they’re backed by military power. Japan must obtain nuclear weapons. This precedent shows if you don’t have the power to exterminate other nations you’ll just be treated like dirt.

    • Chad

      It’s a strange day in hell when Japanese netizen comments are even more nationalistic and pro-military than Chinese ones.

      • dim mak

        So that day hasn’t come yet. It’s all “kill 小日本” over the Chinese boards.

      • Chunghwa

        what do you mean? 2ch has always been “hurr Chinese communists” and “durr let’s exterminate the Koreans again if they steal Takeshima”. You obviously haven’t been there much at all.

        • anon

          I agree with Chunghwa. You need to increase your exposure to more sides of Japanese society. Always ask yourself if your views of any society are being prejudiced by your selective intake of information about that society.

          Also, to the original poster, I wouldn’t say Senkaku Complex is the Japanese version of chinaSMACK. For one, they’re more obvious and forceful with their opinions. For another, they’re really more about otaku culture whereas chinaSMACK is like Chinese internet potpourri.

          • Chunghwa

            sankaku is a shit site that’s full of amateur pr0n, anime/manga, and weeaboo shit. The commenters are all overweight japanophilic neckbeards who have seen every single episode of Seed H.A.C.K or whatever they call those series these days.

            /discussion.

  • miff

    I miss Chairman Mao. When he was running China, he kept it poor and backwards. The modern, developed countries of the world didn’t have to deal with China at that time. Now that China has had a resurgence, the Chinese are trying to avenge every event that “hurts the feelings of the Chinese people.”

    Bring back another Chairman Mao!

    • anon

      Tell us again, how do you feel about black slavery and white imperialism?

  • nereis

    This has never been a question of sovereignty or ownership. This is a dick measuring contest over who has the bigger warships and who can swing their dick around the most.

  • red setter

    Oh Dear Comrades this fisherman ‘gou pi’ (BS) was all designed by our leaders to provide an outlet for our testosterone powered jingoistic ‘Jia You Zhong Guo’ (add fuel China) fervour as we close in on our ultimate orgasmic high: October 1st National Day…

    We are invincible. Everyone must apologise for all past wrongdoings… oh yeah!

    We really are our own worst enemy….

  • NoRacistSmack

    Japanese government could handle this incident better by releasing the captain after the first 10 day detainment period or not trying to detain him at all. Why don’t they just stick to what all Japanese coast guard ships always did in the disputed sea area – monitoring Chinese fishing ships in a distance or encouraging them to leave in a loud speaker or LED screen? Instead, Japan wanted to play as a big boy this time, pretended to act strong in front of China but then find out China has much more cards to play, and Japan’s big daddy the US of A is calling its overweening little boy to go home and site down.

    Japan’s time has long been over. Its four and only four Asian neighbors (Two Koreas, Russia and China, if you don’t count S.E.A. countries thousands of miles away) all hate it and has territory dispute with it, and its big daddy is at home restraining its every effort to build a military force. At the same time, Japanese politicians in the recent several decades were incredibly stupid and incapable in handling foreign relations.

    • Mike Fish

      If… IF… the Chinese fishing boat did intentionally ram the Japan Coast Guard ships, what would you suggest they do?

      • NoRacistSmack

        Calm down, go home and call one’s insurance company like in a normal traffic accident?

    • dim mak

      What are you talking about? America has been goading Japan to abandon their peace clause, rebuild an army and fight with alongside them since the Korean war. It is Japan that continues to refuse to this day out of pacifism and economic concerns.

  • pervertt

    Hmm, the publications of these victory photographs is not a very good idea. The captain should have been whisked away on arrival, away from the media spotlight until this whole business has died down. There is a far too much at stake between China and Japan for this dispute to be inflated beyond reasonable proportions.

    Having said that, these photographs are not as half as stupid as the Japanese government’s decision to arrest and detain the captain of the fishing boat, without thinking through the consequences of their action. Surely they must have anticipated that the Chinese government could not take this lying down, as this would have implied acceptance of Japanese sovereignty over the disputed islands.

    Instead, we have seen the Japanese government take a face-losing but pragmatic decision to climb down and release the captain. It was inevitable, as Japan had far too much to lose over the detention of one man. Foreign Minister Maehara should have learnt an expensive lesson from this debacle – irrespective of who is in the right, never pick a fight that you cannot finish.

  • @@

    enforcing domestic law in international disputed water, real fucking smart, the captain should have gone on a hunger strike during his detention to force the Japanese’s hand even more. you sino-phobic weeaboo fucks can just suck it and whine about you double standard version of “history”. i aint even mad yo

  • Hypocrisy

    i have seen several pictures (chinese and western media) of the boats after the collission and it is quite clear that it was the chiense fishing trawler that rammed the japanese naval vessels. the chinese boat did not show any damage on its sides (port or star board) while at least one japansese boat sustained damage on its side. based on normal ship sterring, the japanese boats were probably trying to drive away or block the chinese vessel and the latter decided to ram it or could not steer away in time to avoid collission.

    diaoyutai is in territorial dispute therefore, chinese nval and fishing vessels normally steer clear. the current chinese administration has a stated policy of not stoking the diayutai territorial claim and therefore, you do not see chinese naval vessels harrassing or confronting japanese vessels. in fact, both chiense and taiwanese governments do not allow activists to visit the diaoyutai area.

    this chinese fisherman decided that money making was more important and decided to take the risk to fish there, hence we have this outcome. patriotism and nationalism aside, this is an incident that the current chinese administration is keen to avoid. the Hu-Wen administration has bigger fish to fry. i think the administration handled this incident well under the incendiary circumstances while the “new” japanese government has fumbled badly. in this incident, nobody won. both sides are wise to keep it cool in the aftermath.

    diaoyutai is really a very small fry for the chinese government – a small collection of volcanic rocks. it can barely be considered as “islands” and is naturally inhospitable. with global warming and rising seawaters, it will be underwater in a matter of time. like i said, there are “bigger fish” to fry elsewhere.

    the issue is kept alive as a foreign policy tool aimed at containing japan whenever the need arises. oil & gas is only secondary as commercially proven reserves are indetermined and deep sea exploration is very expensive and dangerous. there are easier and cheaper places for CNOOC to explore. furthermore, 50 years from today, petroleum will be the energy of the past so why fight over it today?

    • dim mak

      Actually, Chinese fishing boats have been fishing there for generations. Around 100-200 ships per day, while Japanese fishermen tend to stay away. The treaty allows for shared fishing, but Japan feels that it’s getting the short end because it’s China doing all the fishing. To be fair I doubt Beijing would tolerate it if the situation was reversed and it was a ton of Japanese ships fishing near “our island” everyday.

      • bert

        If there are 100-200 Chinese shipping vessels in the area everyday then the Japanese are smart for not fishing in the area. Who wants to eat fish that have been feeding on all the Chinese sh*t and waste from those boats?

        • Chunghwa

          0/10

          in brine, salt acts as a preservative that hinders bacterial growth.
          in seawater, the concentration of salt is enough to prevent any significant risk of microbial poisoning.

          I think you’re confusing seawater fishing with freshwater fishing.

          • bert

            Thanks, good to know. I still wouldn’t want to eat a turd floating in the salty sea :P

          • Chunghwa

            >implying the ocean has a volume of 450mL, and that turds have nowhere to go other than to stick to every single fish, and that turds do not biodegrade
            >implying that the food you eat was not, at one point, in the form of 200 million year old ancient dinosaur turd, that has turned back into a tomato again through natural processes

            Stay classy.

    • John Rabe

      Hi Hypocrisy, good post. I noted the term “contain Japan” which was the only part of your post that I find off-key. Japan has no policy to expand its territory, it does not even have a full military. There is no need to “contain” Japan as it is not planning any expansion. If on the other hand you look at the claims China lays to vast parts of the South China Sea, practically right up to Vietnamese, Indonesian, Brunei and Philippine shorelines, you have a case for “containment”.

  • The Regulator

    The guy standing behind him in the first picture is more than likely a government minder whispering “Don’t forget to plug the party and the government!”, who briefed him on what script he needed to recite on the flight over.

    • Tee Dee Ang

      That’s the point in this case! Plotted. I totally agree with you!

  • sotomayor

    these islands belong to japan, no compromise on that; if necessary we western countries will all stand by japan to defend the world against the new chinese colonialism in africa and south east asia. if there is a country that has eventually has the right to claim those islands based on certain common sense that is Taiwan country and not China.

    • anon

      I didn’t know you speak for our Western countries.

    • Chunghwa

      cool story bro, Mister Ambassador. Now, may I take you back to the Grande Hotel before your blood pressure goes up again?

    • Voice of China

      Taiwan = China

      A quick history lesson mayor. Now please, step back into the vehicle LOL!

    • Cool Matt

      Not saying wrong or right, but kind of funny how China has to point out that Taiwan was, is, and always will be apart of China before they can claim that the Daioyu islands were, are, and always will be a part of China to some people.

      Taiwanese must be like WTF China and Japan.

      • bobiscool

        No Taiwan must htink this is a great opportunity to get diaoyu dao or something else from this.

        IMO Taiwan IS a part of China. I’m not saying it should be part of the CCP, but I think Taiwan and China are ultimately the same country. I don’t care which political group takes control of it..

  • sotomayor

    and by the way, who can be sympathetic with such an ugly (subhuman) being surronded by so many brainwashed idiots endorsing their one party propaganda. Killing/sterilyzing one ugly chinese is a moral duty that all men should share

    • Chunghwa

      you’re obviously not master race, judging by your poor choice of words and terrible spelling.

      oh, and also, you mad?

      inb4 ad hominem, it’s just how I troll (oops, I mean roll)

  • sean

    cunt you didn’t win a gold medal in olympics, why the fuck these bunch of retarded people went to welcome him.

  • http://www.matthewsawtell.com Matthew A. Sawtell

    Hm… given the issues that have occurred with P.R. Chinese citizens in Pakistan, Ethiopia, and the rest of the Middle East – I’m a tad surprised about this reaction – regardless of the history of Japanese/Chinese Relations.

    • Tee Dee Ang

      Question: Are you talking about grave power of state?
      Are Japanese too soft without principles on illegalty?
      Or are Chinese too uni-doctrined?

  • H. gulickx

    china get $1.2 billion aid from japan, better take care i would say

    • Peter in China

      Where can I read about this?

  • http://candosino.wordpress.com terroir

    Any free man who has just been released from jail deserves to wear a shirt that’s been ironed, even a store bought one.

  • elenore

    I feel bad for the people of China.Middle Class is too small to stand up on behalf of People there.With no voting,how do people thrown out corrupt officials/Business.Trade war is coming.China has agitated too many other Nations.Their stimulus was as corrupt as the U.S., should have been used for middle class jobs not multinationals/banks to continue downward spiral.China could have used money to build service economy like public health care and education or Social Security.Same as us we should have used ours for infrastructure like schools/roads etc..WE can vote out our government,we can use state governments as well.Taxes are going to rise in U.S. with ending of Bush tax cuts which I don’t think will be renewed for middle class or rich and with citizens basically rejecting more stimulus,debts should go down in matter of few years.One thing I don’t get is if China is corrupt to their citizens how come they never think it is corrupt to other Nations and diplomacy.Americans don’t trust our government officials with anything.

    • Chunghwa

      Thing is, whilst what you say is correct, keep in mind that many Chinese have no idea what it’s like to live under a different system of government. If they’ve never experienced it, how can they understand it? They have to know what they are protesting for before they can even protest. Of course Chinese attitudes towards the government will be much different to that of the United States.

      also, what’s with the double-width spacing? You’re not typing Chinese here. Switch your IME to UTF-8, and keep in mind that full stops are halfwidth in English.

  • dim mak

    I feel the whole thing is blown way out of proportion, what with conspiracy theories on both side and all. As far as I can tell the Japanese say the exact same things on their side with the countries reversed. Both sides think their sovereignty is being compromised. Both sides blame the other for disturbing the peace. Both sides lament their weak government. Both sides think they’re on the defensive against an expansionist invader, except neither is actually expansionist. The whole thing is like one huge misunderstanding where people insist on painting the other guy as a malevolent force to justify their preconceptions.

    I believe the matter is actually pretty simple. Japan’s government and people are extremely out of touch with the world, and like a socially awkward person, made a string of diplomatic blunders without realizing the consequences. Things like “They’re testing/containing us”, “The US is behind this” are pretty far fetched to me. Conversely, “The fishing boat was a spy boat” or “The Chinese are using nationalism to distract from domestic problems” are equally ridiculous. The legality of the arrest is debatable depending which side you take, but clearly it was a very foolish move from Japan. That being said I don’t feel Japan is ‘out to get us’ like so many Chinese believe. Understand that territorial disputes are common around the world, even arrests made seldom lead to this kind of diplomatic row. It really does boil down to emotions between China and Japan.

    • John Rabe

      Dim Mak, I can agree with most of what you are saying though not all. If the Japanese public is out of touch with reality, what is one to say about the Chinese public that gets spoon-fed information from government-controlled media?
      What strikes me as the common denominator between both countries is that their respective public audiences are ill informed about the other sides’ claims. Someone in this thread translated the comments from 2channel. They show that many Japanese have no idea in the first place as to why the Chinese believe they have a claim on the disputed territory. The Japanese government verbally goes as far as saying that there is no dispute.
      Likewise the Chinese side: there is no dispute, these rocks are ours, and the Japanese side has acted illegally. Period.
      Well no, not period. What I would expect of true leaders on both sides is that they make an effort to explain to their home audiences why this is happening and why the other side thinks they are doing the right thing. You don’t have to agree with them but at least you should understand them. That in itself will calm things down and perhaps pave the way to a more constructive solution.
      And secondly, both side should agree to settle this in an international court. The fact that this possibility is not even being discussed shows how disinterested both sides are in a mature and peaceful settlement.

  • jtc is awesome

    Whole exercise is masturbation. This is dumb and short sighted.

    1. Chinese dude with a V hand sign, actual a Japanese hand gesture: +1 Japan

    2. Proving again to all China neighbors that they just assholes: Japan +1

    3. Entire incident is like a traffic hit and run and when the Japanese boat asked them to stop they ran, proving Chinese dislike the rule of law: Japan +1

    4. China flexing their muscle and show up the Japanese: +1 China.

    5. Australia is fucked because Rio Tinto guy is in jail where this guys is free: +1 China

    6. Chinese media outlets telling its citizens they should not feel safe in Japan because they arrest people for no reason: +1 ME hopefully less rude Chinese people in Japan.

    i’m sure i’m missing some stuff but hey you can only say so much about masturbation

    • Chunghwa

      >V hand sign, actual a Japanese hand gesture
      lol no. Last time I checked Winston Churchill wasn’t a weeaboo.
      >when the Japanese boat asked them to stop they ran
      citation needed.
      >Australia is fucked because Rio Tinto guy
      First of all, I’m Australian. The guy deserved it. You don’t use underhanded tactics to get an upper hand over someone in a business deal, and expect to get away with it.
      >…should not feel safe in Japan because they arrest people for no reason
      implying that Chinese people in Japan travel down Shinjuku Road in fishing trawlers

    • Kip

      Wiki helps a lot. V sign only when silly Jap girls try to be cute… *but I’d hit that… where was i…. erm.. something about masturbation.. Japs.. +100 for Jap AV. Oh, wiki.. V. Winston. England. Really? China. Island is Chinas. Asshole. Yup. But so? Jap Law? Who cares. Land is China’s. Muscle? Not needed. +2 to you. Chinese people in Japan is rude not only in Japan. lol Come to terms.

  • Cool Matt

    Japan is now asking China to pay for the damage to their ships caused by the sea captain.

    http://tinyurl.com/2cz4r7r

    Watch how well the Chinese media continues avoiding the actual incident while responding to the request despite the issue being right in front of their face, they wont touch it. Im expecting something along the lines of this in the news:

    “China has rejected Japanese demands that it pay for the damages incurred when a fishing boat collided with Japanese patrol vessels near the Diaoyu Islands. China maintains that the islands are apart of China and have been since ancient times.”

    • Kip

      Hurray! We should start sending Coast Guards there and arrestin’ some Japs. Eye for an Eye. Just cuz WWII was deleted from their books, don’t mean it was deleted from ours.

  • John Rabe

    Can someone, maybe Fauna, explain what the third comment from the bottom means to say?

    “Normal posts are all deleted. [Yet] SB posts all get approved.”

    • Fauna

      The commenter may be saying that “normal” comments or posts about this news are being deleted but “stupid” comments or posts are not. What is “normal” and what is “stupid” is up to you to interpret.

      • John Rabe

        Thank you, Fauna. I have no idea what qualifies as “normal” so this will remain a mystery to me. But I understand that you cannot do the job for me. Thanks for all the good work you are doing, by the way. You are providing an incredibly valuable public service. All the best to you and your team.

      • Chef Rocco

        My own interpretation:

        In the forum, “normal” comments are those teeming with “idiot”, “brainless fool”, “wumao party”, “fxxk” “retarded people” “ugly wife”, “masturbation” “cunt”, “subhuman”…

        The “stupid” posts are those without above handles.

        Maybe “stupid” people should normalize their comments a bit so that they don’t look fucking (I am trying now) stupid!

  • Mike Fish

    And who will patrol these islands if the Japanese Coast Guard doesn’t? The fact is despite this one incident, the Japanese Coast Guard is usually there providing a real service that directly or indirectly protects those Chinese fishermen. Would China’s Navy, Coast Guard or Fisheries vessels patrol there if the Japanese didn’t?Would they even enforce any laws or regulations regarding safety or fishing violations?

    • Chef Rocco

      Japanese Coast Guard protects Chinese fishermen? Lol, good spin, Mike.

      Maybe you ought to learn something from the mother of all ultimate spins: almost 70 years ago, Imperial Japanese army “entered” Manchuria to “protect” Chinese and to create ” Greater East Asia Co-prosperity Sphere”.

      • Mike Fish

        Great bait and switch. Can you answer the question I asked? Or do you always just use 70 year-old rhetoric?

        • Chef Rocco

          You asked a question, then answered it with your own twisted “fact”, why should anybody bite the bait except a fish, hehe..

          The 70-year-ago spin is indeed old, but it is a classic Japanese one and almost all Asians familiar with WWII history know it every well, you think your little trick can outsmart it?

          • truth

            @chef rocco, why do you hold a grudge that’s in the past. People of today, are not like people of past. We are more educated and we learn history, so that we don’t have to repeated it. Saying that you assume that if a country did this a long time ago, then they would seem to do it again. Fool me once shame on you, fool me twice shame me.

          • Mike Fish

            Please explain. Which twisted fact? It seems the thing you most have a problem with in my comment “directly or indirectly protects Chinese fishermen” is not stating that I think the Japan Coast Guard’s mission is to protect Chinese fishermen, is it? I also don’t say anything about those islands belonging to Japan, do I. However, with all of the fishing activity there and the relatively infrequent number of bad incidents, don’t you think it’s possible that occessionally the Japan Coast Guard might even help some of those fishermen when they are in trouble. Maybe I’m wrong. I know the Japan Coast Guard is there to cause problems. However, I also know that China’s ships aren’t there doing anything usefull either. The matter should be settled by the governments in an arbitration court rather than letting their boats fight some proxy battle for them. You seem to assume that anyone who doesn’t just 100% criticize Japan must then 100% support Japan. My original questions maybe should have been clearer… will China send it’s coast guard to the Diaoyu’s to protect its fisherman? Work on that question and don’t get your panties in a twist.

          • Chef Rocco

            Mike, what on earth are you trying to say?

            In your original comment, you stated: “the Japanese Coast Guard is USUALLY there providing a real service that directly or indirectly protects those Chinese fishermen”.

            Then in your reply to me, you said: ” don’t you think it’s possible that OCCASIONALLY the Japan Coast Guard might even help some of those fishermen when they are in trouble. Maybe I’m wrong. I know the Japan Coast Guard is there to cause problems.”

            You just changed your opinion too fast and I am getting lost. Anyway, the fact is that JCG was there to protect Japanese’s national interests, usually they harassed fishing boats from Mainland China and Taiwan in that area, if these boats try to venture into 12 nm of Diaoyu islands, they would intercept them, force them to abandon their fishing nets into sea, then drive them out.

            China just sent two patrol boats to that area and had a stand-off with six Japanese ships two days ago:
            http://beforeitsnews.com/story/192/903/Japan_warns_China_over_patrol_boats.html

            Look, the news answers your question.

          • Mike Cline

            Thanks so much for the civil discourse. I missed the “usually”, it was late. It took something like this though to actually send Chinese patrol boats there. The news did answer my question.

          • Chef Rocco

            @Truth, the problem for Japan is that it cannot face the truth of its wartime atrocities during WWII. for instance, Japanese school textbooks approved by government are highly controversial for whitewashing war crimes in WWII.

            Are you sure that the new generation in Japanese fully understand what happened in the past?

          • dim mak

            Well that part isn’t true, it is the government approved texts that actually do mention wartime atrocities. The ones that don’t are published by conservative publishers, and not really used in any public schools.

        • Chef Rocco

          Dim Mak, the most controverisal ” New history textbook” (2002 edition) did get approved by Japanese government, but is was shunned by most schools.

          See the link:

          http://spice.stanford.edu/docs/134

    • BlameJapanNotKorea

      Good point! China should start patrolling the islands to prove it’s theirs, because I believe it’s theirs and because it’s their they can patrol and do whatever they want with it.

      Or extract all the soil off the island so it becomes part of the ocean, it’s abit of a wild solution, but I think it can solve this issue well. Plus China has more than enough resources to harmonise the islands. Why go to war? Dig it out and move it. They’re tiny islands and theirs to take.

      Problem solved.

  • korean_guy

    China is celebrating like they accomplished something.

    China better celebrate this apparent “win” occasion while it last because this is will be the closest you will ever come to acquiring Senkaku from Japan.

  • anon

    This article (original Japanese, link is the English translation) is worth reading for anyone genuinely interested in this issue. Here’s a long snip but read the full article:

    The Japanese Coast Guard has been stationing patrol boats to track Chinese fishing boats around the Senkaku Islands, but it had never captured or arrested a Chinese boat, although it vigorously monitored boats from Taiwan and Hong Kong. In the Senkaku territorial sea, partly because of the agreement with Deng Xiaoping to shelve the territorial dispute between Japan and China, both countries adopted the attitude of avoiding conflict at the governmental level, even if political activists among the people demanded the protection of the Senkaku/Diaoyutai Islands. This time, however, the Japanese authorities captured a Chinese boat and arrested the captain. This is an epoch-making event that signifies a reversal of policies toward China.

    The Japanese government has said that it is natural to capture a boat that collided with its ship and that Chinese government anger is unjustified. The tone of the mass media in Japan is similar. And the Chinese side is unable to make a counter-argument because there was no one there except those concerned. It cannot say whether the Chinese boat or the Coast Guard ship was at fault in the collisioin. People’s Daily simply states that, “in Japan it is reported that the fishing boat initiated the collision.” Since the Chinese government can’t argue about what happened at the time of collision, the Japanese claim passes. Link.

    The Senkaku territorial seas are beyond the scope of the Japan-China fisheries agreement, but there has been a diplomatic understanding since Deng Xiaoping, that China and Japan would not oppose each other over the Senkaku Islands. This time, however, Japan annulled the agreement and made a strong claim to territorial rights, involving arresting the Chinese fisherman on the basis of Japanese law. This surprised and angered the Chinese government.

    After the incident, the Chinese authorities decided to dispatch fishery patrol boats which are under quasi-military authority in order to protect Chinese fishermen who operate around the Senkaku islands. For the first time, a situation has arisen in which Japan (the Coast Guard) and China (a quasi-military fishing patrol boat under the Department of Agriculture) confront each other at sea. This is a situation in which a battle could take place between China and Japan. A situation that did not exist for sixty-five years since the Asia-Pacific War, one in which Japan could again go to war, now looms. (Instead of the catch phrase “US-British demons” used during World War II, the threat of China will become the target of Japanese propaganda.) The Senkaku Islands, along with the Nansha Islands and the Yellow Sea, has been upgraded to a world-level maritime dispute in which China and countries around it, with US support, confront one another. Link: 中国軍を怒らせる米国の戦略

    The United States instigates Maehara with a belligerent policy (kōsensaku)

    In the incident this time as reported in the Japanese mass media, the Japan Coast Guard properly controlled the illegal conduct of the Chinese fishing boat and the Chinese government is unwarranted in criticizing this. However, in the past, the Japanese authorities never captured or indicted a Chinese fishing boat, even if they chased them. The crucial point of this arrest and indictment drama is not the reaction of China or the conduct of the fishing boat. Rather, it is the active political will of the Japanese government to arrest and indict when it knows perfectly well that this will anger China. The important question is why the Japanese government now acts to anger China.

    Writing this, I knpw that I will receive critical messages saying, “The previous Japanese response was wrong. For the first time, the Japanese government has taken a dignified attitude toward China. You are wrong to write in defense of the earlier Japanese stance.” However, for me, what is important is not what is right. What is right totally differs between China and Japan. Both Chinese and Japanese people are inflamed by the agitation of the media and talk about good and bad. But talk about good and bad are obstacles that warp analysis.

    Don’t get hung up on the author’s nationality. That’s the first step down the wrong path.

    • dim mak

      Sounds pretty rational, not enough of that on either side right now

    • John Rabe

      Anon, thanks for posting that here. Very analytical and informative. The one thing that I have some doubt about is the implication that there was an intentional shift in Tokyo’s policy. I do not know but I imagine that this may have been the first time that there was a collision and that the coast guards made the arrest based on the collision rather than on a policy change. Much like you would be arrested if you damaged a police car, especially if you are suspected of doing so intentionally. Once the guy was arrested it may have been difficult for Tokyo to directly determine the outcome of the process due to the independence of the prosecutor, and more so the court (this last part probably hard to believe for the Chinese side).
      All of the above is speculation but I am not sure that Tanaka is talking from a factual basis rather than his own speculation.
      In any case it is good to see a public debate, as limited as it may yet be, emerging in Japan.

      • Chef Rocco

        John, in 2004, Japanese police arrested seven Chinese activists landed on Diaoyu Islands, under the pressure of Chinese government, then Janpanese government under Junichiro Koizumi deported them without indictment. Japanese government stressed that it had taken the “big picture” into consideration in its handling of the issue.

        If arresting Chinese fishmen may not a policy change, starting legal procedures to indict the captain certainly is.

        • John Rabe

          I thought no indictment was made against the captain of that boat this time either…

          • Chef Rocco

            The difference lies at this time, upon arrest, Japanese police transferred him to a local prosecutor’s office and let him go through legal procedures in accordance with Japanese domestic laws, which implies that Japan has indisputable sovereignty over the islands. Chinese side does not want to accept the implications and was angry at the policy change to previous mutual understandings over how to handle fishing in the area. That’s why we saw all the protests and counter-measures against the move.

          • John Rabe

            I see. Interesting point.

  • Jay

    China may think they won something here but what Beijing and the super-nationalists won was a consensus among its neighbors that China is really dangerous, unstable and unreliable. China is getting increasingly pushy, arrogant and unreasonable and this is bad news for everyone – including China.

    • Tee Dee Ang

      I agree with you. One-sided arrogance and selfishness are real danger in Modern World. As written under, I can’t really understand how he can take that posture and comments back home.

      • truth

        agreed China is a sleeping baby giant, we don’t know how this will go

  • C Mao

    Shanzai plane??? DEER JET should that not be Learjet….ah I am sorry the Chinese never invented anything worthwhile except pointless patriotic propaganda…

  • Tee Dee Ang

    Is it customary in contemporary China to declare victory boldly as soon as ariive home after giving his people worries and cares about him all over the world? If one respects Confucianism as well as the Golden Rules, East or West, that kind of attitude is obviosly considered arrogant and selfish. Otherwise, was he on some mission or something from the very beginning?

    • dim mak

      It’s not ‘victory’ or ‘defeat’ for anyone. These kinds of exchanges over disputed territory are quite common, except when it happens in other places, people just glance over the news and move on…

  • Koreansentry

    I didn’t know illegal fisherman can become hero in China, can I be China’s hero by fishing illegally in Sea of Japan and got arrested by Japanese navy?

  • londonmay

    Total retard! Can’t believe the chinese comments supporting him as some sort of hero… the moron went fishing were he shoulden’t have end of story. Why do chinese make a big scene out of nothing and manage to put into it national pride and patriotism is behind me.
    Japan and Japanese are clever and cute and Chinese are just can’t seem to get over the fact that their country is way better than “wonderful China”

    • Chucky

      China is the biggest hypocritical country if there has been one.

      I’m a Korean and I believe the Japanese side of the story, that the Chinese ship rammed the Japanese coast guard ships. That’s because Korea has had lots of experience with Chinese fishing ships that violate routinely into Korean waters to fish, steal, and damage Korean marine environment. The problem is so bad, that in some clear days, you can see the miles and miles of sea covered in Chinese ships, in some clear days from the Korea’s West coast. There’s just too many Chinese junks that Korean coast guards can’t possibly arrest them all. So one Chinese ship went into Senkaku. Big deal, try 500 in one day, for 365 days! It’s not pretty.

      They send five hundred fishing ships to Korean recognized waters daily, so that they can steal fish off of their neighboring country. What the Chinese media doesn’t even bother to report: Let’s see the Chinese killed an unarmed Korean coast guard who was attempting to arrest the crew. The Chinese ships typically put up a fierce violent fight whenever Korean coast guards try to tow them. They fight with picks, axes, metal pipes. The officer who was murdered was hit over the head with a shovel, while clinging for his life, on to the side of a fleeing Chinese vessel. The Korean coast guards have the right to sink everyone of these illegal thieving junks which cover the Korean coastal areas like a sea of locusts. Yet Korea, is ham tied because they fear a Chinese reaction as such as we have seen against the Japanese. There was no punishment for the killers, and the Korean government didn’t even bother to protest to China. What this does is, it only encourages the Chinese to grow even more bold. Their attitude is, you are a small country, we’re going to do whatever we like just because we can and you can’t do anything about it. If a Chinese coast guard was killed by a Japanese or Korean illegal fishermen, I’m sure the Chinese would react with understanding and acceptance. Yeah right.

      IF China wants to be the good guy, get your damn boats off of other people’s countries. In Korea, five thousand Chinese fishermen are detained annually! Five thousand! They are fined and released. But I guess that’s too much of a shame for Chinese media to even report what their illegal fishing junks are doing in other countries.

      • NoRacistSmack

        Lol, I just love how you claim you’re a Korean and use Hideki Tojo as your picture. Have to be one of those “Korean guys” on CS and some other blogs who wanted to sell something.

        • Chef Rocco

          I just wanted to point that out. He is like a Jew uses Hitler as his picture, really amusing.

  • Concerned Citizen

    Finally, a well deserved victory for China.

    Hip Hip Hooray!

    • CAINE

      China may think they won something here but what Beijing and the super-nationalists won was a consensus among its neighbors that China is really dangerous, unstable and unreliable. China is getting increasingly pushy, arrogant and unreasonable and this is bad news for everyone – including China.

      • Kip

        Why is it bad news to China? US has been like you quoted “pushy, arrogant, and unreasonable”… what bad news exactly has it brought to them? If anything, China has been weak, and quiet on many issues.

  • Eidolon

    Let the man alone with his twenty five seconds of fame. It’s the most he’ll ever get.

    Lol @ the Chinese reactions, as usual.

    As for the Korean nationalists who can’t resist making snide comments: for a country whose extremists slaughter animals and set themselves on fire to protest Japan, you sure can talk. We’re just waiting for the next incident over Tsushima/Daemado to pop up. Popcorn in hand, naturally.

    • Eidolon

      Not to mention Dokdo…

      • historyrepeatsitself

        Japan needs to remilitarize. If it really came down to it, I have my money on the Japanese.

        • Not Japanese

          I agree, I would rather support a democratic nation that upholds basic human rights that a country where information is surpressed.

  • Not Japanese

    What bullshit. That territory belongs to Japan. And they have the right to detain anyone who enter their territory illegally.

    • pervertt

      Of course the Diaoyu/Senkaku Islands belong to Japan. Just as the Kuril Islands belong to Russia, right?

  • CAINE

    WHAT A SHAMELESS HERO, smiling after bringing such an embarrassment to Heavenly Kingdom, Beijing has to play dirty to get him free, SHAME SHAME SHAME ON CHINESE

    • GoTeamAmerica

      What do you suggest to unshame them then?

      Oh I know, let’s just say that undercover intelligence says Japan has WMD and are a great threat to the world so they have to invaded………. of course only a dumbass would ever think of ludricous idea and carry it out.

      I’m glad that never happened in the past in another part of the world…….. oh wait……..

  • Concerned Citizen

    Let us all celebrate the triumphant return of our Hero!

    Let this incident be a lesson to our aggresor.

  • Jenny

    I agree with (MIff); is is Japanese territory and they had the right to detain the captain for those 17 days, in which I felt he should have been kept and sent to prision. Now that there is video footage released about what happened, showing how the captain hit the Japanese ship (on purpose). It is by INTERNATIONAL LAW that if there is about to be a colission between two ships that you (the ship/boat) must turn RIGHT. The Chinese ship turned LEFT. I don’t mean to sound like I am against China and all for Japan. I just want to report what truly happened without any bias. And if you must know I am white, not Asian. And like many others in the west, we all feel that China or rather the captain of the Chinese boat is at fault and not the Japanese. The Japanese repeatedly tried to get the Chinese ship to leave the area and to stay clear from their ship, but sadly this did not happen. I do still love China though, just not concerning this incident.

  • aflame

    It looks like the Korea has bigger balls than Japan :)) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x4hO3ipevno

  • Yuki

    I’m Japanese, but I don’t hate Chinese. Most people are nice and hardwporking, but PLEASE let me say that I’m just SICK of their shameless acts. When do they learn that they’re not supposed to step into other people’s yards?

Personals @ chinaSMACK - Meet people, make friends, find lovers? Don't be so serious!»